Talk:Pero Qué Necesidad

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Kyle Peake in topic GA Review
Good articlePero Qué Necesidad has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 25, 2023Good article nomineeNot listed
June 3, 2024Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Pero Qué Necesidad/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Eurohunter (talk · contribs) 18:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Magiciandude: I started review. Comments will be below. Review within 2023 GAN Backlog Drives. Eurohunter (talk) 18:34, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Lead

edit
  1. "it reached number one on the Billboard Hot Latin Songs in the United States" - if Billboard isn't part of the record chart name, then shouldn't it be "Billboard's Hot Latin Songs"? The same for section "Promotion and reception". Eurohunter (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Background and composition

edit
  1. There is no introduction to previous "Fue un Placer Conocerte" (again, why capitalised?) and next single "Lentamente". Eurohunter (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  2. There is no introduction to track duration. Eurohunter (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Promotion and reception

edit
  1. I would note that Mario Tarradell review is according to album. Eurohunter (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Other

edit
  1. Why is the title "Pero qué necesidad" capitalised if Spanish language not requires it, and we also write French or Italian titles without capitals. Eurohunter (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  2. Sections "Track listings", "Personnel", "Charts" and "Release history" are missing. Eurohunter (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  3. Is there enough notable songs produced by Gustavo Farias to create Category:Song recordings produced by Gustavo Farias? Eurohunter (talk) 20:24, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  4. Links to redirects in references also missing links for Billboard. Eurohunter (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  5. Incorrect titles in references. For example, the title of reference 11 is just "Gracias Por Esperar - Juan Gabriel". Eurohunter (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
  6. Replace parameter "Work" or "Publisher" with "Website" in references. Eurohunter (talk) 20:29, 2 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

There have been no responses here or edits to the article since the nomination was opened, so I have closed this nomination. Please feel free to renominate this article once the above issues have been looked over and the article otherwise meets the WP:GACR. Best, CMD (talk) 12:42, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Pero Qué Necesidad/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Magiciandude (talk · contribs) 17:48, 11 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: K. Peake (talk · contribs) 08:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply


  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):  
    b. (citations to reliable sources):  
    c. (OR):  
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):  
    b. (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):  
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:  

(Criteria marked   are unassessed)

Of course we've been in reviews together for the past so you know what to expect; this one should be done quickly! --K. Peake 08:07, 2 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Infobox and lead

edit
  • Change Soundabout Studio to Soundabout per Template:Infobox song
  • The translation title can be written out in the body, rather than invoking the ref in the lead
  • "Its production was handled by" → "The song was produced by" and also add written by Juan Gabriel since the lead is short enough that you could do with this inclusion
  • "The song is a" → "It is a" to sound less repetitive
  • "It was released" → "The song was released"
  • "with critics listing" → "with a few critics listing"
  • The term "several" being used is redundant
  • Add a comma before whose in the last sentence

Background and composition

edit
  • Add the release year of "Heal the World" on the audio sample
  • "a hiatus following legal disputes" → "a hiatus after legal disputes"
  • "The dispute involved Gabriel" → "The dispute involved Juan Gabriel" to be consistent
  • "but would not be released" → "but it would not be released"
  • "and Gabriel renewed his" → "and Juan Gabriel renewed his"
  • "both the name of the album" → "both the album's title of" removing the brackets since they would not be needed in this case
  • "in which lyrics describes" → "in which the lyrics describe"
  • "He re-recorded the track" → "Juan Gabriel re-recorded the track"

Promotion and reception

edit
  • Per the Los Angeles Times ref currently used in the lead, add a second sentence with the translated title and mention the Spanish radio from that ref
  • "brotherhood". It features children" → "brotherhood", featuring children" to improve the flow
  • "Ramiro Burr wrote for the" → "Ramiro Burr, writing for the"
  • "compared it to ABBA" → "compared the song to ABBA"
  • "despite its "serious theme", he found it" → "despite the "serious theme", he found the song"
  • "Classic Rock reviewer ranked it" → "a Classic Rock reviewer ranked the song" and the source shows number seven for me, not number three
  • "Gabriel earned the" → "Juan Gabriel earned the"
  • "Commercially, it topped" → "Commercially, the track topped"

Charts

edit
  • Why is this table not present when the song did reach charts?

See also

edit
  • Good

References

edit

Final thoughts and verdict

edit