Talk:Persona 2: Innocent Sin/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Will be happy to offer a review. JAGUAR  22:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "The original version was not localized for western territories, but the PSP version was released" - however

   "Persona 2: Innocent Sin is a role-playing game where the player takes control of a group of High School students" - should high school be capitalised here?

   Personally I would rephrase "Innocent Sin began development after the release and success of Persona" to Development of Innocent Sin began after the release and success of Persona

   "The original audio was lauded by Bartholow, saying the voice acting" - stating

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   References check out OK, reliable sources, no evidence of OR

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Neutral

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Stable, no edit warring

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images used

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This article meets the GA criteria and I couldn't find anything worthy of putting this on hold, so I'll pass it now. Well done! JAGUAR  11:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Whoa, that was fast! Thank you for the review! (although I was not the one who wrote the article - that honor goes to ProtoDrake).--IDV^talk 11:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)