Talk:Pete Tyler

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Dead = no affiliations?

edit

Why can't Pete be "affiliated" with Rose and Jackie? Adric is still affiliated with the Fourth and Fifth Doctors, and he's just as dead... arguably more so. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 17:09, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

I suppose the appearance of "real" Pete in just one episode doesn't seem as strong as Adric's longer-term association to me. But if you disagree, then go ahead and re-add it. --khaosworks (talkcontribs) 17:27, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply
Well, even though "real" Pete appeared in only one episode, his presence is felt in more (e.g. Gwyneth's mention of Rose's dead father in The Unquiet Dead]]). I'd say he merits an "affiliation" credit on the basis of how important his role in the series is — even if, technically, most of his on-screen appearances have been as his alternate-universe self. —Josiah Rowe (talkcontribs) 20:12, 14 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Torchwood

edit

Is he affiliated with Torchwood? He was with Torchwood in Army of Ghosts/Doomsday. (unsigned)

Parallel universe version, yes, after they destroyed their version of Torchwood 1, they took it over. In the "real" universe, it was closed down. Digifiend (talk)

File:Pete Tyler.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Pete Tyler.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 16 November 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 22:00, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

File:Pete Tyler alternate.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

edit
 

An image used in this article, File:Pete Tyler alternate.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale as of 3 December 2011

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

  • If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
  • If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
  • If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 11:38, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Pete Tyler. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply