Talk:Peter & the Wolf (2006 film)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Mojosam in topic Removed link to official website

Fair use rationale for Image:Nr6 p&w Production stills.png

edit
 

Image:Nr6 p&w Production stills.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 07:36, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

1 link removed - clip was film footage. No indication from clip information or uploader profile, that uploader has rights to the footage or is associated with the relevant film company or production entity. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:12, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Peterandthewolfposter.gif

edit
 

Image:Peterandthewolfposter.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

"Peter's character and facial features are similar to Harold of Harold and Maude." edit by 198.188.96.2

edit

Hello I'm very inexperienced in using Wikipedia and this might be the wrong way to query this latest addition to this article... but this isn't really a FACT is it? Rather just someone's personal observation. Thanks for any advice. Animatrixa (talk) 18:29, 31 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter and the Wolf (2006 film). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

I removed the link to the official website. It has been taken over by an online gambling company. Interestingly, if you scroll about halfway down their page, they have kept what I assume is the content of the original page. This is probably so search engines will still link to it. I assume we want to delink this page. We no longer have any assurance of the accuracy of the information. Mojosam (talk) 19:35, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply