Talk:Peter Ashmore (director)

Latest comment: 7 months ago by Robertsky in topic Requested move 13 April 2024

Requested move 13 April 2024

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. – robertsky (talk) 06:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)Reply


Peter Ashmore (theatre director and actor)Peter Ashmore (director) – Another possibility is Peter Ashmore (theatre director) or Peter Ashmore (actor) but I feel that his main claim to notability is as a director.. As per the policy Wikipedia:Article titles and in particular, Naturalness, Precision, Concision, and Consistency. The current name is unwieldy, and non-standard, in that it does not align with others in the subcategories of Category:Directors. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 18:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

I think shortened title of Peter Ashmore (director) is extremely vague. It implies he could be a director of anything: of an oil company, of an accountancy firm etc. He was a theatre director and actor. AntientNestor who supervised the first edits for this article had no objection to my title. Ellenrich (talk) 20:04, 13 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
That's a possibility, but I was basing it on the majority of people listed at Category:British theatre directors. Most are listed as (director), some as (theatre director), and others with different disambiguation types. The idea is to go with concise. AntientNestor should be pinged so they can give their own opinion. CambridgeBayWeather (solidly non-human), Uqaqtuq (talk), Huliva 16:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
My bad—careless. The only function is to distinguish the subject from others with same name. It would be different if there were already a "Peter Ashmore (director)" and we needed further differentiation. AntientNestor (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.