Talk:Peter Hendy

Latest comment: 2 months ago by 2A0A:EF40:109B:EF01:B4F9:49A0:C6FB:3984 in topic Trustee of London Transport Museum?

Untitled

edit

Removing the link to 'Peter Hendy's Myspace page' as clearly this is nothing to do with him, the text is direct copied form wikipedia, and it appears to be a 'fan' site of some sort. If indeed it is Peter Hendy's myspace, then my god, TFL's press agents are scraping the bottem of the barrel to an extent they're soon gonna start tasting wood. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.152.242 (talk) 01:09, 8 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

Suggest page move

edit

I suggest this page be moved to clear the 'Peter Hendy' space for a disambiguation page. I don't think the "British Peter Hendy" is any more notable than the "Australian Peter Hendy". Any suggestions for a suitable title for the British Peter Hendy? Lester 22:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Hendy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:26, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Peter Hendy. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:01, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

That Daily Mail story

edit

All the reporting I found on the prostitution claims put forth by Daily Mail- which boiled down to just British tabloid The Standard, trying to replace the Daily Mail citation (which is a depreciated source), come from reporting allegedly from an interview conducted by British tabloid The Sun. When I searched on The Sun's website, the article or interview wasn't there, which to me suggested it may have been retracted at some point. Cheese2863 (talk) 12:01, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Much of the controversy section appears to have been inserted by User:Garethdennis this morning. Whilst I am not unsympathetic given the issues that have ended up being aired in the media today, I am not convinced that Gareth is the best person to be in a position to follow WP:NPOV. It may be appropriate to revert or try to rewrite some of these edits accordingly. Adam Williams (talk) 12:16, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
To be honest this is fair enough. It was my hope that an intrepid editor would find a better source. I'm thankful that the Controversy section does now exist though. GarethDennis talk · contribs · website 12:21, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The controversies have now melted away but that unreliable source the Guardian is now reporting the matter (linking to the Daily Mail) and reporting more besides.[1] Thincat (talk) 14:44, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
in light of guardian repetition of it, that seems like it should be enough to merit continued inclusion? Flatthew (talk) 15:17, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
It could possibly go into personal life, however i have concerns that it was only included in the Guardian Article due to the edits from this morning Miawgogo (talk) 15:20, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
I have added a chopped down version of the paragraph containing only what can be sourced off of what the guardian said. you'd hope they wouldn't have included it only off the back of it being on here. Flatthew (talk) 15:35, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

The Guardian publishing material definitely makes it more reliableGRALISTAIR (talk) 19:32, 29 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Trustee of London Transport Museum?

edit

Under Other appointments, he is listed as being an independent trustee of the London Transport Museum however, according to the museum's website, he is not on the board of trustees - https://www.ltmuseum.co.uk/about/governance 2A0A:EF40:109B:EF01:B4F9:49A0:C6FB:3984 (talk) 23:01, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply