Talk:Peyton Randolph
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Peyton Randolph article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Thank you
editSurely he is the fist president of the united states then? --90.213.246.167 (talk) 23:34, 26 July 2008 (UTC)
- No. The United States didn't even exist when he was President of the Continental Congress. Jcb9 (talk) 17:38, 9 August 2008 (UTC)
- Peyton Randolph was the President of the "Continental Congress". However, the role was not that of Head of State.After 1781 the role was re-titled "President of the United States in Congress Assembled", but still not "President of the Untied States" It was not until after the US constitution in 1789 that the post of US President, as Head of State was formed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Davidbhoy2805 (talk • contribs) 01:28, 29 December 2008 (UTC)
- As explained by Jcb9 and davidbhoy2805, he is certainly not the first president of the United States and the statement should be removed until anyone can prove with reason otherwise. The closest comparable title under present terms would be Speaker of the House. —Preceding Uspastpresentwatch (talk • contribs) 16:27, 10 January 2009 (UTC)
am i just short on sleep or is the
"preceeded by" "succeeded by"
Backwards? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.165.173.90 (talk) 00:25, 30 January 2009 (UTC)
What?!
editWhy was my link containing official documents deleted.
How can there be a claim of no sources when there are some people with, apparently some agenda, deleting information.
Nantucketnoon (talk) 01:12, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- The problem is that the page was, in large part, an advertisement for the author's book. WP:EL, the external links guidelines, say that such commercial links are generally to be avoided. I'm not convinced that the information on the rest of the page outweighs the advertising. —C.Fred (talk) 01:13, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
Work needed
editAlthough I'm not in a position to tidy this up much, I worked a bit on this article today. It really needs some citations, yet I'm far from a Virginia history room and the local library by my dad's house last week said it wouldn't order any books via interlibrary loan unless I changed my residence. :( So here's hoping someone can do the work this bio needs.Jweaver28 (talk) 20:38, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Peyton Randolph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070926222256/http://www.vahistorical.org/dynasties/index.htm to http://www.vahistorical.org/dynasties/index.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:45, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
Randolph Was Not First President
edit. . . either "technically" or otherwise. The United States did not technically exist as a national government until the Articles of Confederation were ratified. The leader under that official regime was the Connecticut native, Samuel Huntington.Mwidunn (talk) 20:06, 4 March 2022 (UTC)
- @Mwidunn: I eliminated this assertion, which I agree is nonsense. Of course, the nation did not yet exist, but also, Randolph was elected only to lead the assembly not the colonies which remained separate sovereignties for seven more years. You are absolutely correct about the Articles of Confederation and Huntington as the first leader of the newly formed Confederated Congress. The only "corrective" there is the Articles intentionally did not allow for a chief executive (they were fed up with kings), so "technically" the U.S. did not have a leader. Allreet (talk) 12:15, 22 July 2022 (UTC)