Talk:Piledriver (microarchitecture)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 19 May 2018

prod

edit

I just created this. it needed to be separated off. all of AMDs articles are terribly messy, and pile-driver, at least, is deserving of its own article, no different than sandy bridge or ivy bridge Aunva6 (talk) 14:58, 20 March 2013 (UTC).Reply

add windows 7 core parking patch information

edit

i have added the core parking info as it is still relevant to AMD piledriver and later AMD modular cpus Leexgx (talk) 05:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Lost control :-/

edit

Could someone please revert to the version from Mikhail Ryazanov 01:28, 30 September 2014‎ ? I completely lost control over the "rowspan" stuff :-( I'm very sorry and will try to do better next time without messing up something -- 194.8.209.244 (talk) 19:05, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 19 May 2018

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus to move, no case to answer at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 21:00, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply



Piledriver (microarchitecture)AMD Piledriver – Please place your rationale for the proposed move here. Tholme (talk) 10:32, 19 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.