Tholme

Jacob Bell

Thanks for the picture of Jacob Bell. Vernon White ^{. . . Talk} 09:37, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Changing image size

Hello have you read the manual of style, particularly this: WP:ImageSize? It appears that changing the default size of thumbnails is wrong. If you agree, please undo your edits. Thank you --CutOffTies (talk) 16:24, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Yes, I have read WP:ImageSize and I don't think my edits are in violation of WP:ImageSize. I have only enlarged some images that already had another size lower than 300px set, but was still bigger than 220px. Some of these I maybe should have removed the specified size instead, but i did not want to reduce the image size if the editor had a reason to enlarge it. Feel free the remove the image size altogether if you find images were an enlargement is not warranted. My other edits have been removing the specified image size so that users preferences is honored. Have I done any other edits that you think is in violation? Tholme (talk) 17:03, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't realize that the image already had a size set. It seems to me that there should no size set at all. Whether or not you want to update the images is your decision. Thanks. --CutOffTies (talk) 17:19, 18 May 2011 (UTC)

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from NATO phonetic alphabet. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not remove language links to articles; this is considered harmful editing. Lighthead (talk) 21:30, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I removed the language link to nn:Bravo from the Nato phonetic alphabet because Bravo in Norwegian does not mean NATO phonetic alphabet. Bravo has the same meaning in Norwegian as in English. It is only one letter in the phonetic alphabet and the Norwegian article does not give any information about the Nato phonetic alphabet, except that Bravo is part of this alphabet. I can not see how this could in any way be seen as a wrong edit.Tholme (talk) 14:37, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

Image sizes

Tholme, you have been resizing the lead images on a number of articles as thumbs. That is not appropriate. Please read Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Image, and revert your edits. --Epipelagic (talk) 22:12, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Hi, I don't see how my edits are in violation of Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Images. And I think the edits are very much in line with Wikipedia:ImageSize#Displayed_image_size. Specially the note about forcing image size below 300px which makes lead images smaller than the rest of the images. After your comments I have set the lead image to 300px in Gestation crate (I think removing the image size here was wrong and I intended to set it to 300px which my edit summary said). I also set it to 300px on Gas van. If you find any other pages where you think my edits are in violations of the policy please give some examples.Tholme (talk) 16:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

Considering your choice with Catwoman made sections craptastic, you may want to actually consider looking at what you leave behind instead of just sliding everything to 220. - J Greb (talk) 22:52, 7 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi,

First of all i didn't slide everything to 220px, but to the default image size (and some with upright set) so that users can decide on an image size between 120px and 300px (with a default of 220px).

And can you please describe what you are seeing as craptastic in this version: [1]? I have tried several resolutions and not in one can I see anything resembling craptastic (except for extremely low resolution below 400px width, but even then less craptastic that a lot of wikipedia articles with images.) I would have liked it better without clear-left, but I can definitely see no reason why clear should be preferred over clear-left. Tholme (talk)

Pigeon photography

You have changed numerous image sizes on pigeon photography, and I had to revert it because it was not an improvement. Due to its photographic topic, the article is overloaded with photographs and there is nothing much one can do about it other than remove vital information or make images smaller. I put a lot of effort into this before nominating the article as a featured article candidate, making sure that images are displayed in relative sizes that roughly correspond to their importance and size of relevant details, and that the layout is still relatively sane in most use cases (various browsers, screen resolutions and font sizes). If there is any policy-based reason for the degradation that you caused, then the policy needs fixing. Hans Adler 15:08, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Non-free rationale for File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Eichmann, Adolf.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 01:20, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Photographer's Barnstar
	Congratulations, Tholme, you've recently made your 1,000th edit to articles on English Wikipedia! Thanks for your tireless efforts to standardize the size of images in the encyclopedia, and for all your contributions. Keep up the good work! Maryana (WMF) (talk) 18:00, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

Vrba

Hi Tholme, please don't keep changing the image sizes at Vrba. It's a featured article, so it has to look tidy, and the MoS allows sizes to be fixed. Removing the sizes is leaving some images large, some small. Please discuss on the article talk page if you disagree, rather than continuing to make the changes. Many thanks, SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:07, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Also, the alt text isn't useless. It used to be required for featured-article status, but isn't now. Nevertheless, filling it in (even with just the word "photograph") apparently stops screen readers reading the caption out twice. That's why it's there. SlimVirgin ^(talk) 17:14, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Calendar and Contacts Server, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Python (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 23:18, 4 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Trolleybus usage by country, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balti (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:59, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (File:GirlWithASuitcase.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:GirlWithASuitcase.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 15:46, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Weather box width

I've opened up a discussion at Template talk:Weather box#Width. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather, Uqaqtuq (talk), Sunasuttuq 02:24, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dag Hammarskjöld, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Union Minière. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:21, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi

I created an article about singer Carina Jaarnek today. She died yesterday. If you want to, take a look.--BabbaQ (talk) 12:58, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tholme. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Tholme. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Tholme. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Izmir Smajlaj, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lichtenstein (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 20 December 2018 (UTC)

Lint fix?

Hi. I saw your fix here. I see there was a stray </div> tag; was that the lint problem? Is there a reason I'm not seeing the error when I go back to that version? (I seem to recall seeing lint errors at some point in the past when previewing pages).

Was there a problem with using {{Nowrap}} around the {{Legend}} items? I did it because without it, it rendered that column unnecessarily narrow, causing the Magenta item to wrap. Thanks for the info. —[AlanM1(talk)]— 01:31, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Hi. There were three lint errors. The stray </div> was one of them. The {{Legend}} template uses a div which is a block element and since nowrap uses an inline span element you get an Miscellaneous Tidy replacement issues div-span-flip error. I belived that nowrap was not nessesary because the legend had only one word, but that was not the case. I fixed it by manually using a <div class="nowrap"> around Magenta. I'm not sure how you checked the old revision, but with [User:PerfektesChaos/js/lintHint] I can see the error if I edit the old revision. Tholme (talk) 08:29, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Billie JD Porter

The article Billie JD Porter has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non notable, fails WP:ENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 23:46, 22 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Billie JD Porter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Model (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 22:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Pages with many Linter errors

I noticed that you have been fixing Linter errors. Thanks! I've been working on them for over a year, mostly in Template space and article space; feel free to ping me if you get stuck or if you want to work on a group of them together.

Do you know about User:Galobot/report/Articles by Lint Errors? I asked to have this report set up. It shows 500 articles with the most Linter errors (limited to 21 per type of error). It is refreshed by a bot every few days. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:50, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Welcome to WikiProject Medicine!

We at Wikiproject Medicine would like to thank you for your contribution now during the 2019–20 coronavirus pandemic. We are far from out of the woods with regard to the pandemic and understand that your focus may lie on coronavirus efforts.
We would still like to shine a light on our active medical community, which you are more than welcome to join. As a participant you can ask questions and get help about best practices on editing any health or medical article — on our talk-page. We are a (mostly) collegial bunch, and I do hope you feel welcome to participate. Currently there are two active communities:

• Wikipedia:WikiProject Medicine (talk — The general medical community)
• Wikipedia:WikiProject COVID-19 (talk — A temporary COVID-19 community)

Please join up!

Best regards, Carl Fredrik ^talk 09:53, 20 March 2020 (UTC)

March 2020

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 09:34, 30 March 2020 (UTC)

Recent edit to 2020 coronavirus pandemic in Virginia

In this edit you changed the header lettering with the edit summary of Revert. This has to do with screen width. It will only fix this for some screen resolutions. The browser will use the space that it has available.) If adjusting it makes it easier to read for some readers and doesn't make a difference to other readers, then why not just leave it alone? I do not understand your reasoning. Shearonink (talk) 15:48, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Edit summary

Thank you for your work to fix lint errors. I have a suggestion. In your edit summaries, instead of just "lintfix", why not say something about what was wrong or what you changed? This might encourage other editors to look for the same errors or not to make them in the first place. I write detailed edit summaries: Special:Contributions/Anomalocaris. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:40, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Football squad list

Thanks for that tweak. Do you have any ideas how you can force the columns together? Cheers, Number 57 22:46, 24 May 2020 (UTC)

No, sorry. The example with two tables works like that, but I don't think it's possible without creating other problems as long as css columns are used. Tholme (talk) 22:59, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

Editing archives

Editing talk page archives is generally frowned upon. Are these changes you're making really necessary? Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

I see you have read this, as you went and edited a page in my user space. I've rolled back all your "lintfixes" in archives. Please stop making them. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:11, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Please don't revert my lint fixes. Some of these errors are ruining the whole talk page. The errors makes big portions of the archive indented, which was never the intention. Also don't go around reverting the same minute you send me a message on my talk page. Tholme (talk) 19:14, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Why? You had time to go and edit my user page, but no time to respond to me, so I saw no reason not to revert your inappropriate edits. And since all of your edits simply say "lintfixes", how an I supposed to know which ones are fixing major problem, and which ones -- like the ones I looked at -- were minor changes that shouldn't have been made? Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

@Beyond My Ken: Please talk a look at this revert you did and check the how the Talk:Winter_Soldier_Investigation/Archive_3 page look like now. Do you really think this is constructive? Tholme (talk) 19:20, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Yeah, so it's improperly indented, so what? It's still perfectly readable. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:25, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Please take another look:

• it's improperly indented
• half the page is in red text instead of the black color it should be in
• The font has been changed to Comic Sans.

I can understand that this is not something you care about, but I do not understand why you think reverting this fix makes wikipedia any better? Tholme (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

• (1) Provide a proper edit summary for your edits, saying specifically what you're doing each time. (2) In general, archives don't need to be edited, unless it's something spectacularly bad. Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
• Most archive pages have this on the top:

This page is an archive. Do not edit the contents of this page. Please direct any additional comments to the current talk page.

Beyond My Ken (talk) 19:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Please take a look at Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#EDIT where fixing format errors and layout errors are specifically allowed (this also goes for the archive pages). My edit summary says lintfix with a link to Special:LintErrors where you can find more information regarding the Lint Errors I'm fixing. I could understand you if all your edits had very good edit summary, but looking through your recent edits, most do not have any edit summary at all... Tholme (talk) 19:51, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Where are you seeing it say that this is allowable for archives. All I can see is that it's talking about talk pages themselves, not the archives. If we allow people to go around editing archives willy-nilly, people will be changing content to better suit them. It's better not to allow editing at all. Leave the little errors alone. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Beyond My Ken: Linter fixes do not typically result in changes to the contents of the page, only to the formatting. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

I'mnot charging Tholme with changing content, and I believe his edits were made in good faith, but -- as I said inthe comment above -- it's best all-around if we just leave the archives alone, unless there's a major spectacular problem which prevents them from being read. Fix little errors in public spaces, fine, but please consider archives to be off limits.

I won't revert any more of Tholme's archive edits, if they pledge not to make these edits in archives anymore. Beyond My Ken (talk) 20:17, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Beyond My Ken: I don't think your view has consensus. The page linked above says that this is explicitly permitted: Fixing layout errors: This could include moving a new comment from the top of a page to the bottom, adding a heading to a comment not having one, repairing accidental damage by one party to another's comments, correcting unclosed markup tags that mess up the entire page's formatting, accurately replacing HTML table code with a wikitable, etc. Those are the things that people who fix Linter errors on talk pages (including archived talk pages, of course) are doing. – Jonesey95 (talk) 20:26, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Again, talk pages, not talk page archives. Beyond My Ken (talk) 21:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)

Well, I think the same rules applies for talk pages and talk page archives. Notice (as Jonesey95 already wrote), the template says Do not edit the contents of this page. and not just only Do not edit this page. I also believe there is clear consensus for allowing fixing of layout and formatting errors even in the archive pages. I will reinstate the lintfixes unless you have any good reasons for why not. Tholme (talk) 14:02, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

Beyond My Ken, Jonesey95: Yes, it is correct and proper to edit archive talk pages to remove lint errors, especially lint errors that leak out of their immediate area and cause everything that follows to be indented wrong, or in a font size that is larger or smaller than normal, or in a color or font family different from normal, or in italics or bold or in any way not normal. See: Wikipedia:Linter#How you can help. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:05, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

LThe age you cited is neither a policy nor a guideline. Beyond My Ken (talk) 22:42, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Beyond My Ken: Whether WP:Linter is or isn't, strictly speaking, a "policy" or a "guideline", this page has authorized and encouraged editing user talk pages for over two years without controversy. During this time, many thousands of talk pages and many thousands of talk page archives have been edited according to its guidelines with hardly a peep of protest. On a handful of occasions, an interested Wikipedian has raised a polite question. Referencing WP:Linter has always resulted in a reply along the lines of "OK, carry on." When the 2018 Linter upgrade resulted in formerly-OK-looking pages suddenly looking bad, that reinforced the goal of preserving what people saw, and that means fixing lint errors. (Of course, any lint errors that leaked to the end of pages even before the Linter upgrade should also be fixed, because original editors intended their contributions to appear as they would appear without a markup leak from elsewhere on the page.) Cheers! —Anomalocaris (talk) 03:34, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Since its not policy, it can;t "authorize" anything, and since it's not a guideline, it can't even "suggest" something. Archives should only be edited out of extreme necessity. Lint errors aren't that. Please stop giving Tholme justification for edits they shouldn't be making. Beyond My Ken (talk) 03:54, 30 May 2020 (UTC)

Beyond My Ken: You assert,

• In general, archives don't need to be edited, unless it's something spectacularly bad.
• Archives should only be edited out of extreme necessity.

Let's look at the editing history of the archives that Tholme edited most recently. In each case I list each edit from the final archiving to just before Tholme's edit.

Article	Last arch. date	edit date	edit author	edit summary
Talk:The Beatles/Archive 18	3 January 2009‎	11 October 2010‎	KslotteBot	changing to aan template, consistence for all archives belonging to same talk page; using Wikipedia:AWB
		13 January 2011‎	Mahanga	rm tag
		22 July 2017‎	PrimeBOT	Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA
Talk:Fascism/Archive 48	30 May 2019‎	8 May 2020‎	AnomieBOT	Substing templates: {{Nac}}. See [[User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster}} for info.
Talk:Kilogram/Archive 6	13 May 2011‎	15 August 2011‎	76.113.124.50
		12 June 2014‎	SporkBot	Repair transclusions of deleted templates
		12 June 2014‎	SporkBot	Repair transclusions of deleted templates
		17 July 2018‎	WOSlinker	strike fix
		19 July 2018‎	WOSlinker	u fix
		19 July 2018‎	WOSlinker	code fix
Talk:Yeshu/Archive 4	10 August 2011‎
Talk:Winter Soldier Investigation/Archive 3	10 July 2006	23 December 2006‎	GurchBot	moved Talk:Winter Soldier Investigation/Archive3 to Talk:Winter Soldier Investigation/Archive 3: standardizing archive names
		30 April 2007‎	Cydebot	Robot - Renaming non-free template "HistoricPhotoRationale" per Wikipedia:Non-free content/templates.
		22 July 2017‎	PrimeBOT	Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA
Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive 89	24 March 2013‎	6 June 2013‎	Technical 13	Archive header update. using AWB
		16 November 2016‎	50.249.99.129
		16 November 2016‎	50.249.99.129
		16 November 2016‎	50.249.99.129
		16 November 2016‎	50.249.99.129
		16 November 2016‎	50.249.99.129
		16 November 2016‎	50.249.99.129
		23 July 2017‎	PrimeBOT	Replace magic links with templates per local RfC - BRFA
User talk:Frank/Archive 2	21 July 2009‎	13 October 2010‎	SmackBot	→‎Desperate Housewives Episode Deletion: Subst: {{unsigned}} (& regularise templates)
User talk:Fram/Archive 35	17 January 2018‎	7 December 2018‎	CommonsDelinker	Replacing Poertschach_Stiller_Advent_See-Weihnachtsbaum_28112014_855.jpg with File:Pörtschach_Stiller_Advent_See-Weihnachtsbaum_28112014_855.jpg (by CommonsDelinker because: File renamed: Präzisierung des}}
Talk:The Protocols of the Elders of Zion/Archive 5	26 September 2008‎	5 September 2010‎	BD2412	→‎Articles for deletion/The Protocols of Zion (imprints): Fixing links to disambiguation pages, improving links, other minor cleanup tasks, replaced: germ →... using AWB
		6 October 2010‎	94.187.44.234	→‎Maurice Joly: diabolical plotters in hell
		6 October 2010‎	Beeswaxcandle	Reverted edits by 94.187.44.234 (talk) to last version by BD2412
Talk:Toronto/Archive 7	11 October 2013‎	18 January 2014‎	AnomieBOT	Substing templates: {{ESp}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.
		26 December 2014‎	Johnny Au	WPCleaner v1.34 - Simplified
		26 December 2014‎	Johnny Au	WPCleaner v1.34 - Simplified
		26 December 2014‎	Johnny Au	WPCleaner v1.34 - Simplified
		26 December 2014‎	Johnny Au	WPCleaner v1.34 - Simplified
		26 December 2014‎	Johnny Au	WPCleaner v1.34 - Simplified
		26 December 2014‎	Johnny Au	WPCleaner v1.34 - Simplified
		2 February 2015‎	SporkBot	Repair duplicate template args
		3 February 2015‎	SporkBot	Clean up duplicate template arguments
		19 February 2015‎	AnomieBOT	Substing templates: {{unsigned}}. See User:AnomieBOT/docs/TemplateSubster for info.
		24 March 2017‎	JJMC89	Migrate {{Infobox settlement}} coordinates parameters to {{Coord}}, see Wikipedia:Coordinates in infoboxes

Of the 10 archives Tholme edited most recently, 9 had at least one edit between the final archiving and Tholme's edit. One edit prior to Tholme's edit was calmly reverted. The other 35 edits were allowed to stand, including by you. This shows an apparent consensus that it is OK to edit an archive for many reasons. Many of these edits were done to repair problems far smaller than improper indentation, with half the page in the wrong font color and the wrong font face. I hope this disabuses you of your theories about archive editing being reserved for cases that are "spectacularly bad" or out of "extreme necessity". (One final point: it is particularly troubling that you reverted edits of other users' talk archives. For all you know, the users who "own" those pages might be pleased to have their archive pages appearances restored to how they looked before the Linter upgrade that was less tolerant of linty markup.)

Cheers, —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:11, 31 May 2020 (UTC)

Don't correct demonstration lint errors

Your edit of 9:19, 26 April 2020 of User talk:Signvisas corrected the original linty signature that I was intentionally using to show that the proposed new signature markup had the same output. The user had already updated the signature by then, but the "error" shouldn't have been corrected. —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)

Sorry, this was hastily fixed. I have now reverted this linfix in this user archive so that your message is correct. Tholme (talk) 19:51, 1 June 2020 (UTC) 

Stripping font tags

I don't think there's a consensus for stripping font tags from talk pages, as you did in your edit of 20:44, 2 June 2020 of Talk:Freemasonry/Archive 13. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:33, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Or, for that matter, stripping tt tags, as you did in your edit of 20:56, 2 June 2020 of Talk:Deaths in 2012/Archive 1. —Anomalocaris (talk) 21:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

I fixed the first edit. Something must have gone wrong with your script or process, Tholme, because you successfully replaced font tags with span tags (including incorporation of <tt>...</tt> formatting into the span tags) in the second edit. If you made other edits that simply stripped font tags, please revert them and use span tags instead. Thanks! – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:38, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

@Jonesey95:, please take another look at the output of the pages. I only stripped non working font tags. Your edit instead replaced it with non working span tags. (hex colors need # in front to work) Tholme (talk) 23:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

You are correct. I have reverted my edit. Now it's MY script that needs adjusting! – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2020 (UTC)

Jonesey95, Tholme: the font tags in Talk:Freemasonry/Archive 13 had hexadecimal colors lacking pound (#), which font markup allows but span markup does not. I have put the colors back in. The appearance is changed now, but it is the same as it was before the Linter upgrade, when font colors wrapping links acted like font colors inside links. Tholme, if you stripped font tags from any other pages, they should be restored. —Anomalocaris (talk) 06:49, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Mercer logo

Hi. I re-added the SVG logo to Mercer (consulting firm) for several reasons: 1- SVG is better; 2- a logo without a tagline is preferable; 3- I'm not 100% sure that the logo on commons is free, it may eventually get deleted. Regards, --Ben Stone 07:40, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

@Benstown: Thank you, I agree that svg without tagline is preferable. I'm quite sure that the logo is free, there are only text and simple geometric figures in the logo. You should upload it to commons so that other wikis and wikidata can use the same logo. Tholme (talk) 09:24, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

1889 Mudgee election

Hi, I see you have been trying to fix a problem with Results of the 1889 New South Wales colonial election#Mudgee but it seems without success. Is the problem you have identified that Electoral district of Mudgee#1889 currently only excerpts the text and not the table, or is there another issue I haven't noticed? Thanks --Find bruce (talk) 22:56, 29 June 2020 (UTC)

@Find bruce: Yes this was the problem. I see you have fixed it by removing a surplus return. Thank you! I'm not sure why this fixed the problem? I found the problems by checking for LintErrors (slow loading). There were a few more pages with the same problem. I think I have fixed them now. Tholme (talk) 00:15, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for fixing those. The tables are generated from various election box templates, but I noticed that the excerpt problem only seems to occur when there is a manually entered row. Like you I don't know why it fixed the problem that doesn't appear on the original article, but at least we found a solution. --Find bruce (talk) 03:30, 30 June 2020 (UTC)

Usage of template

Hello, I have seen you have modified my edits at Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences regarding the template link. Technically speaking, templates are not supposed to use this way because you reach to the template documentation instead of what templates is actually doing when you click on the link in this case. In this particular case, you can still see the Nobel Prize winners list plus other technical items instead of Nobel Prize winners list. In this case, only when {{2019 Nobel Prize winners}} is used, then you get the original template author intended table of Noble Prize winners in Year 2019; and so on. I hope you understand the mechanics of the template, now.Dhawell.hlugalay (talk) 08:17, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Hi @Dhawell.hlugalay:. I do not think having navboxes inside infoboxes is OK. A link to a navbox might be ok, but I think the best would be to just remove the previous and related parameters in this infobox if there are nothing better than these templates. Tholme (talk) 08:21, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

@Tholme: Yup, you made a good point. Previously, I've just focused on what previous editors have made similar inappropriate usage of template and tried to fix that. Well, presentation-wise, we can make something better. Let me think a way with internal linkage to these templates.Dhawell.hlugalay (talk) 09:45, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Diags above secs in the markup

Hi. Am curious re the purpose of this change. (Is it to make more efficient use of vertical spacing on the page? Or? I see there's no difference when viewing thru the mobile dev viewer.) Ok, --IHTS (talk) 04:46, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

@Ihardlythinkso:. Yes, it was to make more efficient use of vertical spacing on the page. Tholme (talk) 23:45, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Lorem template change

Was this an attempt to fix the linter issue? Please engage at Talk, if so, because I'm not sure what the intent was, and others are still looking at that. Appreciate the desire to help out at the lorem template, but your fix broke multiple test cases, and I had to revert it. It also broke examples on the /doc page, which you would have seen in Preview mode before hitting Publish. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 17:30, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

@Mathglot:. Sorry. Yes it was an attempt to fix linter errors, but it didn't. It was an hastily and poorly testet edit that I should not have done. Thank you for the revert. Tholme (talk) 17:41, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Can you point me to where I can see linter errors in a sandbox page and/or testcases page? If you look at the discussion on Talk, I have a vague sort of idea of what's going on, and I think the paired p-tags idea may fix it because there won't be any more newlines within the span scope I don't think. If linter stuff requires certain permissions, then I can try making that change I suggested at Talk to the sandbox, and you could check the linter results after. Does any of this make sense? Mathglot (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Lint help at Mass killings under communist regimes

In my first attempt at trying to track an error with Linthint I found one: missing end tag for i at Mass killings under communist regimes. I checked the source and find 535 <i> and 535 </i>. I highlighted strings delimited by start-i and end-i just to see if the tags got out of sync somewhere or backwards or something, but it all looks good. Is there a way to configure Linthint to point to where the error is? Otherwise, how do I go forward from here to see what the error is that Linthint is reporting? (please  mention me on reply; thanks!) Mathglot (talk) 04:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Here's how I do it: Click Edit, then click the yellow LintHint button at the upper right. It will list the Linter errors. Click the down arrow next to any one to highlight it. Some caveats: It will sometimes highlight a big block, like a table or a template, instead of pinpointing the error; you have to inspect manually. If you fix an error at the top and then click to highlight a lower error, the highlighting may be offset if you added or removed characters above; start at the bottom of the error list to avoid this problem. It can help to have a syntax highlighter enabled, because sometimes the highlighting is somewhere after the error, and you can look backwards to see where the highlighting breaks. – Jonesey95 (talk) 13:27, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

@Mathglot: Hi. As Jonesey95 says you can click on the arrow next to the linterror when in edit mode. In Mass killings under communist regimes it will highlight the paragraph from revisionism]]'' and till the end. While the missing tag is not in this last italic marking, if you take a look further up in the same paragraph you can see that there is missing a ' in '[[Fascist (epithet)|fascist]]''. If you have syntax hightlighting enabled you can also see that the whole end of this paragraph is in italics (or look at the page itself). Hope this was helpfull. Tholme (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Smiley template

Hi Tholme! I see you've gone around changing {{p}} redirects into {{smiley}} templates, and that you've removed the links to this redirect from the template's documentation. Is there any reason for doing so? I like using the {{p}} redirect since it's shorter, but is there any reason why I should not? ☿ Apaugasma (talk ☉) 00:04, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

I came here with the same question. {{p}} has survived three XFDs so I don't think you have any justification to go round messing with other editors talk page posts to remove it. SpinningSpark 00:19, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:28, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Hey - I hadn't noticed your fixing of my user subpage - thank you very much. I knew there was something wrong with the syntax but I couldn't quite work out what. Bobo. 03:30, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

You and I editing Comparison of file systems

I finally figured it out! I tried to remove the murder trolling out of it. But I got to an old version of the article through a link on slashdot. That made me edit a really old version of the article. Should be more careful when clicking links! Sorry! 85.76.97.34 (talk) 18:09, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:12, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 19 November 2024 (UTC)