This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ItalyWikipedia:WikiProject ItalyTemplate:WikiProject ItalyItaly articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
Can the editor who added Hither Green rail crash to the See Also section please explain how that crash is related to this crash or why it should be in that section (or the article at all) ?,
The HG crash isn't mentioned in the article (and Pioltello isn't mentioned at Hither Green),
Seems nonsensical to include it. Cheers, –Davey2010Talk14:47, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply
Hi Mjroots, Ah crap I'm so sorry I didn't know it was you!, I don't mind reverting but shouldn't there be some sort of text next to it saying why it's related ? i suppose it could have it's own section too on both articles but just having it as a see also in my eyes is silly as the reader isn't going to know why it's related :), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk15:35, 28 January 2018 (UTC)Reply