Talk:Pizza in the United States

Old discussions

"(Note: Canada is a sovereign country and not part of the United States.)" does this really have to be said?

Holy crap yes, who took it out? That part was awesome. And now look what happened: Someone got rid of the part on "Canadian Pizza" as if it's impossible to acquire it in the US. --216.185.88.58 (talk) 13:50, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Pizza as a vegetable

I'm just opening a discussion here so we have someplace to send people who want to add the recent congressional bill about pizza as a vegetable. I'm opposed to adding it, because it does not add to the reader's understanding of pizza and strikes me as falling under Wikipedia:Recentism.— alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 19:35, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Tis garbage, and untrue at this time. I asked for temp protection to stop it. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 21:01, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

I agree, and keep reverting it because it's only in terms of public school subsidized lunches, and that President guy hasn't signed off on it. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 13:19, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

People seem to be missing the point on this anyway. As I understand it, 2 tablespoons of tomato paste already count as a vegetable serving. The USDA wanted to increase that to half a cup but were blocked by Congress. It's not a change Congress introduced but a change they blocked. In other words, if you want to talk about pizza as a vegetable even if this is a little misleading, it's what's the case right now not what's happening if the Congress bill is signed in to law. Nil Einne (talk) 14:17, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

News articles in respected newspaper state that 2 tablespoons of tomato make a slice of pizza in US school lunches count as a vegetable serving. See Minneapolis Star Tribune, Reuters story in Toronto Sun. The information that pizza is considered a veggie in US school lunches belongs in the article, the more so because fine Wikipedia editors like Jerem43 believe it is untrue.That way the references will be easy to find and confirm. The encyclopedia is here to present important and well sourced information such as this in an NPOV way, with appropriate weight. Edison (talk) 18:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Your sarcasm aside, the entries added are not true. They state that congress passes a law (it didn't) and that pizza is now considered a vegetable (it isn't). What the USDA considers a serving of vegetables is not what is being added repeatedly, it is links to an article published by Reuters about some partisan members of congress trying to challenge Mrs. Obama's project to improve the quality of school lunches to help combat childhood obesity in the US as a political tool to use against her husband. It is a pure case of recentism and will die down in about a week or so as the 24-hour news cycle turns its eyes elsewhere. Additionally, the article is about how pizza has been adapted to the cuisine of the United States and the various forms those adaptations have taken and not how the USDA establishes and classifies dietary requirements. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:03, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

I deny the presence of any sarcasm, and resent your assertion of it. I firmly believe that you are a fine editor. Please stick to discussion of how to improve the article, and skip false assertions of inappropriate editing. What about "News articles in respected newspaper state that 2 tablespoons of tomato make a slice of pizza in US school lunches count as a vegetable serving" do you not find in the 2 articles I cited? See also NY Daily News: "The bill also would allow tomato paste on pizzas to be counted as a vegetable, as it is now. USDA had wanted to prevent that.."You claim that the coverage of the "pizza as vegetable" policy "will die down in about a week or so as the 24-hour news cycle turns its eyes elsewhere." Did you notice that the Reagan administration's desire to consider ketchup as a vegetable continues to get coverage, 30 years later? Why would coverage of "pizza is a vegetable serving" disappear quicker? Edison (talk) 20:51, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Despite my earlier position, I'm starting to think that Edison has a point. First of all, the title of the article doesn't accurately reflect the limitation to the adaptation of pizza in the USA but in fact makes it a natural place for this info, and secondly, I think that changing the title to keep out stuff that evidently a lot of editors, IP and otherwise, are looking to find out about in this article, would itself be recentism. Perhaps we can put a section at the bottom with a brief discussion of the matter? I would support that, and it would keep it out of the lead, where I don't think it belongs, but where the IPs seem to want to put it.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 21:47, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

The information, if it's is truly encyclopedic and not just idiotic partisan posturing that makes the US look like a bunch of rubes, belongs in a section on the health and nutritional value of pizza. If such a section exists, it belongs in the main pizza article, not this one, which is indeed about the forms of pizza-as-cuisine found in the United States. And the And even so, there's no real value to the inclusion of such recentism. oknazevad (talk) 21:56, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Please note the article Ketchup as a vegetable which documents a similar US government proposal, in an attempt to save money on US school lunch programs in 1981. Is that article encyclopedic? If you think it isn't, then put it up for AFD and see what happens. Being in the news does not exclude a topic from being covered in the encyclopedia, and such a view is contrary to our guidelines. "Tomato paste (or sauce) on pizza as a vegetable" is not a recent policy change; it is a continuation of an established policy. It has already had enduring impact, and it has national impact. The only "recent" thing is people finding out about it. The US government has such a policy, and it is seen as an unusual policy, then it is encyclopedic to include it in the article devoted to pizza in the US. Edison (talk) 23:13, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

@Oknazevad—I believe you're making a false dichotomy between encyclopedicity and idiotic partisan posturing that makes the US look like a bunch of rubes. Encyclopedias cover idiotic partisan posturing that makes the US look like a bunch of rubes if it's notable as well and being idiotic and partisan (see any article on modern US politics, e.g.). We need to draw conclusions on neither the non-idiotic nor the non-partisan nature of the posturing. We merely have to describe what's happening from a NPOV. Until someone starts the article you suggest, I think that the information ought to go here, since this is a natural place to look for it as evinced by the number of editors who keep trying to add it. After someone starts the article you suggest, I think it will still be worth a few lines in here with a hatnote link to the main article. I don't see why it belongs particularly in the main pizza article, although that's not our concern, because it has very little to do with pizza per se, but everything to do with pizza in the US.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 23:37, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

• Support for inclusion - After watching the debate, I think user:Edison & User:Alf.laylah.wa.laylah have the right idea in that there should be a section noting Pizza's status in the US, since this article is a sub of Pizza, which makes this article the same as a paragraph in Bacon#Around_the_world. Therefore, I think we should add a section with a heading of "Pizza in American Culture" or somesuch thing, and add that here. IMO, this would lend the article to expansion into being something more than what it is now, which is almost a list. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 00:02, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I can get behind that. Just be sure that we don't repeat the incorrect "Congress said pizza is a vegetable" nonsense that has been reported in the news. Let's make sure we accurately describe the situation as the sauce on pizza counting as a serving of vegetables in dietary exchanges (which has always been true; ask Weight Watchers). oknazevad (talk) 00:44, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I can accept that, as long as we stay with the facts and only the facts. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 04:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Break to discuss title of new section

May I suggest that we call the new section something more like "Pizza in American law"? Based on my experience with other articles, I'm worried that if we mention the words "American culture" in there we're going to end up with a list of every movie ever made with a pizza in it.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 02:59, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sold on that title. It just sounds a little...silly...trivial? Maybe just "pizza in school lunches". oknazevad (talk) 03:57, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm not sold on it either, it was top-of-the-head material. I'm just thinking of the nightmares of "In American culture" sections. On the other hand, "pizza in school lunches" sounds a little overly specific for a section name.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 04:14, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, if that's what the section covers (the discussion in the media), then a specific title is appropriate. As I said, anything broader about the nutritional value of pizza (which isn't specific to the US) belongs in the main pizza article, in part because of the issue mentioned by Jeremy in his following comment. oknazevad (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

The problem is which type of American pizza do you cover? --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 04:37, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Well, most school lunch pizzas aren't Chicago deep dish, and would get laughed at in New York. It's pretty generic and an insult to the term "pizza", in the opinion of this former teacher who has suffered through it before. That said, just because it's generic, processed stuff doesn't mean it's not actually pizza. Just like processed American cheese is still cheese. oknazevad (talk) 12:56, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm leaning towards ==Pizza in American Culture== as a heading so we can add more divergent material to it later, then have something like ===Status in School Cafeterias=== as a subsection. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 13:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

That leads to Alf's concern, which I share: such headers become magnets for non-notable pop culture trivia. It'd be one thing to mention the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles, for example, (as they're particularly famous for pizza eating in some versions), but such sections are usually pretty problematic. (Also, headers are in sentence case, per WP:MOSHEAD.) oknazevad (talk) 13:25, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Maybe we should add "Frozen pizza" to the list of styles of American pizza; it's got to be a legit type of American pizza, and then we call the section "USDA definitions of frozen American pizza"? Again, I'm suggesting content of headings, not wording.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 14:31, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

That's certainly true, Oknazevad. OTOH, Pizza is a cultural food and while such sections can be problematic, they often lead to major article expansion. I would agree, TMNT would be a good example of Pizza in American Culture, I probably wouldn't include a reference to the Pizza Bowl on Laverne & Shirley. As with everything on the 'pedia, it's a judgement call. I also agree with Alf.laylah.wa.laylah, frozen pizza should be included in the list of types/styles. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 15:47, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Actually, the USDA does have a very specific set of regulations about frozen pizza; Wolfgang Puck had to reformulate his frozen white pizza line because of them. How about USDA regulations or USDA definitions as a section header? I strongly suggest we stay the hell away from anything that will devolve into a list of how Shaggy and Scooby would eat the most disgusting pizza combinations or how Joe's Pizzeria of Walla Walla, Washington created the world's largest pizza as a fundraiser. Trivia sections (that what it would turn into) are not encyclopedic. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 17:36, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I think you may have nailed it. That's the sort of broad-enough-to-cover-multiple-topics, yet narrow-enough-to-avoid-becoming-a-trivia-magnet header we need. oknazevad (talk) 18:52, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm good with that. Best, Markvs88 (talk) 02:49, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm in.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 03:03, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Another type of pizza

Double-decker pizza: a Chicago-style pan pizza with a thin pizza on top. They are found in Chicago and they are delicious. Not adding to article because I don't have refs. --Javaweb (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2012 (UTC)Javaweb

"Pan" Pizza

I am surprised that no mention of delivery style "pan" pizzas is made. This type of PIzza has been popularized by chains like Pizza hut and differs from normal pizza in that is essentially fried, using a large amount of oil in a pan with sides which is then cooked in the oven. It ceates a very different crust. I was also suprised not to see any mention of "french bread" pizza, which despite the name is very much american and would not likely to be found in either italy or france.97.91.179.137 (talk) 23:39, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

History / Popularity

The blanket statement about the rise in popularity in the later half of the 20th century should be embelished I think. That a food could go from nothing to approximately 30% of meals consumed in the country is an important point both from a consumer and historical perspective. Is it worth adding a "history" section to this article, or some kind of elucidation about its rise in popularity over a 20 year period? - J 70.36.212.48 (talk) 20:32, 23 January 2013 (UTC)

In my view this section is highly unsatisfactory. In the early-mid 1950's the very name and notion of "pizza" was very generally unknown in much of, or most of the United States. But within the next ten years it had become universally known and available. It is a remarkable story and it wants to be described and documented by someone knowledgeable about the topic. I merely know of these developments because I and my age-mates from many parts of the nation lived through it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.102.212.139 (talk) 01:23, 12 August 2022 (UTC)

Wayne Lynn

The only reference I could find on a "Wayne Lynn", regarding this edit There's mention of a Reuben pizza, but the article doesn't explicitly state he originated it, though that is implied. It appears there's some kind of connection to a store named Sun Foods. Gzuufy (talk) 17:08, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Popular Toppings?

I think this article is missing a list of popular toppings for American pizza. Like black olives, yellow peppers, pineapple, pepperoni, sausage, bacon, anchovies, etc. Inhahe (talk) 01:29, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Plain Pizzas and White Pizza in relation to New Haven-style pizza

A "plain" pizza has tomato sauce and no mozzarella, not a pizza without tomatoes or a "white pizza". New Haven-style "white pizza" is famous for having clams as a topping. Benjamin5152414 (talk) 19:59, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Good source. I don't think anyone can object. oknazevad (talk) 23:49, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

Merger Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was not to merge as the source article, Pizza carbonara, was deleted via WP:PROD Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 23:11, 12 February 2017 (UTC)

---

I propose that Pizza carbonara be merged into Pizza in the United States. I think that the content in the Pizza carbonara article is best explained in the context of Pizza in the United States as the dish seems to have originated there. It is made by topping pizza dough with the sauce usually used in the Roman dish, carbonara, where it is a sauce served with pasta. The Pizza in the United States article is reasonably sized at present, so that merging of Pizza carbonara will not cause any problems as far as article size or undue weight is concerned. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 18:49, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Maybe. I think we need some more references to prove that it's even notable. Passing mentions is all the sources appear to be, certainly insufficient for a standalone article. And there's little evidence of long-term significance; this seems to have been something of a brief fad. Maybe a brief mention at the Pizza in the United States article is warranted, but even then it seems like the main contributor to this is tat one of the national chains seemed to have jumped on a regional fad that itself has already faded. oknazevad (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

I'm also good with deleting the pizza carbonara article. I could find but a few references, which I added, and proposed the mereger as I too think it's not notable enough for a standalone article. Geoff | ^{Who, me?} 23:02, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

It appears to be a kind of topping for pizza nothing more. Id say delete Pizza_carbonara. A regional pizza is unique in crust and base ingriediants (sauce, toppings, and crust)Lbparker40 (talk) 13:54, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Proposed merge of Trenton tomato pie

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was to merge -Apocheir (talk) 01:55, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

---

User:Apocheir has proposed merging Trenton tomato pie here, but has not initiated a discussion on this proposal. However, I would be inclined to support such a merge. bd2412 T 16:40, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

• Oppose, Sources show Trenton tomato pie as notable distinct form of pizza with over 100 years of history. This makes the pizza culturally significant to the United States. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 17:12, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

First, I apologize for not having the time to initiate this discussion when I added the merge tag. Thank you, User:BD2412. Also, given the confusion at Talk:List of tomato dishes#Proposed merge of Tomato pie and Talk:Sicilian_pizza#Italian_tomato_pie, maybe we should hold off on this until those merge proposals are resolved.

That said, my rationale is this:

• Trenton tomato pie is a stub. It's not likely to grow beyond a stub. I am not proposing deleting any content (besides editing so that it meshes with the rest of the page): I am proposing to merge the entire contents of Trenton tomato pie.
• Local food pages like Trenton tomato pie (especially stubby ones) tend to be magnets for boosters, knockers, vandals, and local restaurants who want to promote their business. They tend to quickly degrade in quality; I'd much rather it be part of a larger page to prevent that.
• While Trenton tomato pie is well-referenced to be a notable form of pizza, it's not clear to me that it's any more notable than any of the other variations listed here that do not have their own page.
• Trenton tomato pie does not establish how a Trenton tomato pie is different from any other pizza made with cheese on the bottom. It appears that "Trenton tomato pie" is what people from New Jersey call that kind of pizza, but such "upside-down" pizza is also served in some New York City pizzerias, and it's not called "Trenton tomato pie" there. There is no evidence that the other places got it from Trenton; tbh they probably all got it from Italy. I have raised these issues at Talk:Trenton tomato pie#Initial comments and have not received a response. Again, this is not a rationale for deleting any content: it is a rationale for including it with a more comprehensive article.

-Apocheir (talk) 18:52, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

I disagree that it will stay a stub forever and I don't think that's a valid merge rationale. And yes it does distinguish this type of pizza's uniqueness. This might backfire, I would like to ping DGG (talk · contribs)'s opinion here, but there are some serious sources like Pizza Today which documents notable forms of pizza clearly defining them. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 18:58, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

I think that it is perfectly reasonable to deal with this with section redirects. If there is a section or subsection on Trenton tomato pie in this article, and the title Trenton tomato pie redirects to that section, then readers looking for the specific topic will be taken to that section in the context of the subject of which it is part. If the section later grows too large to be accommodated as a section, it can always be broken out again. bd2412 T 19:15, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

• Support. I agree with Apocheir's rationale perfectly. Especially the part about boosterism, and that this isn't more notable than other variants. Also, I want to point out that local newspapers running articles about who makes the best version of a dish does little to establish independent notability, as they're actually about the restaurants, not the dish as a whole. The sources covering this all consider it as a type of pizza, which is what this article is in large part, a list of types of pizza found in the United States. The real question is does it deserve a separate entry, should it be mentioned in the general tomato pie entry, or should we have an entry for "upside down" pizzas that mention it's popular in the Trenton area? oknazevad (talk) 19:43, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
• i don’t have access to computer right now I could use Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs) opinion here. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 22:46, 15 February 2018 (UTC)

Please be mindful of WP:CANVAS. -Apocheir (talk) 03:12, 16 February 2018 (UTC)

As per WP:APPNOTE:

• • Editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article
  • Editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics)
  • Editors known for expertise in the field

Northamerica1000 (talk · contribs) is involved in this field particularly United States cuisine, this would not be considered canvassing. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 15:52, 22 February 2018 (UTC)

• Comment: I have listed this merge discussion at WP:PMGO. -Apocheir (talk) 23:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
• Support mainly per Apocheir's reasons 2 and 4. TeraTIX 01:16, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
• Comment, there are two votes against and my vote for. The proper procedure is to RC this discussion, I reverted an IP closure, the Oknazevad (talk · contribs) made an improper attack in the closing statement which is a violation of AGF. I highlighted my reasons for the revert this is the furthest thing from unacceptable behavior the only unacceptable behavior is the accusation. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 00:30, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
  • There is only one oppose and four supports. At this point I don't see how, after 10 months this can be said to be anything other than WP:CONSENSUS for a merger. Consensus does not need to be unanimous. oknazevad (talk) 00:37, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

@Oknazevad:, again there is nothing wrong with you closing and merging, the issue is your bitey comment you left. These is not a case of WP:IDHT, it is not disruptive editing it is the revert of an improper IP close and such accusations against a twelve year editor will always be defended. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 00:43, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

For that I apologize. It was a failure on my part. Please accept my apology. oknazevad (talk) 00:45, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

No problem apology accepted. Valoem ^{talk contrib} 00:55, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Parmigiano

I seriously doubt that many US pizzerias use the real Parmigiano Reggiano or Pecorino Romano. Except for a few high-end places, they are surely using imitation "parmesan" and "romano" cheeses. I will try to find some good sources for this.... --Macrakis (talk) 13:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Stats

This article could use some statistics. This blog post has some interesting ones, but it doesn't cite all its sources, and without better references they feel a bit like hearsay. But it might be a good starting point to try and source some of the most relevant ones. -- Beland (talk) 21:47, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

Cleveland style

A web search and personal experience show this as marketing at various restaurants, but none other than Michael Symon personally describes it (July 3, 2011). Mapsax (talk) 19:49, 19 October 2019 (UTC)

Possible resource

https://pizzahistorybook.com/ Mapsax (talk) 00:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

History of pizza in the United States

This article states that pizza arrived in the United States in the early 20th century. The entire paragraph (opening paragraph) is cited as from Linda Stradley's 2014 work Pizza - History & Legends of Pizza". What's Cooking America. However, the article on the History of Pizza states it was the late 19th century and cites Carol Helstosky's 2008 work Pizza: A Global History as the source for this claim. So that's two different articles with two different time periods. It might be an idea to incorporate both into this article.

Further, the history section of this article is itself lacking. You go from 1905 and the opening of the first pizzeria in the United States, to a brief discussion of different regional types in the nation, to a brief discussion of chain and frozen food consumption. When did pizza really spread out and become popular in the United States? When did the Californian pizza become popular outside of California? Who is credited with creating Chicago deep dish? This section really needs to be expanded because right now it sounds like following Lombardi's opening in 1905 pizza was a big hit all over the nation. The following may help, it is from the third edition of Evan Jones' American Food: The Gastronomic Story published by The Overlook Press, Woodstock, New York 2007 (ISBN-13 987-1-58567-904-1), pg. 154

Even more Italian and even more popular is the pie called pizza, which was charted by a 1970 Gallup poll as the favorite snack of Americans over twenty-one and under thirty four. A wedge of tomato-covered bread dough with the savor of oregano along with a briny anchovy tang misting upward, or the texture and taste of mushrooms nestled in one or more kinds of bubbling cheese, can be marvelous informal food. Neopolitan-style pizza with all their American modifications became as readily available as any common sandwich. Pizza rustica, Italy's "deep dish" cheese-and-meat conglomerate, is made in American homes, but only a few resturants specialize in a pie that has crisp crusts tops and bottom, sort of like a fruit cobbler. In Chicago one such place developed such a reputation that it attracted stalwart pizza fans willing to travel as far as forty-five miles for a rustic snack gooey with mozzarella, sausage, and tomato sauce; and others even came from such distant places as Chattanooga, Tennessee.

 The book was originally published in 1974, which would be why the Gallop poll is from over 50 years ago, Admittedly this does not itself give much on the history of pizza in the United States, but it would add to what is there already.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.181.44.118 (talk) 05:06, 12 June 2023 (UTC) 

Bar pizza

Hey, Oknazevad! The Bar pizza section seems to be sourced to a blog and a permanently dead link. The only thing I could find on VisitMilwaukee.org didn't mention "bar" pizza. Valereee (talk) 17:23, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

I did manage to find an archive of the dead ref, but I'm not sure we should take the Milwaukee tourism site as a reliable source. Really the whole "Variations" section really needs to be scrubbed for unreliable sources. Apocheir (talk) 20:55, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

I agree. Many of these supposed local versions are only sourced to local promotional sites or local news. The latter is better, but still less than ideal. Many of these variants are not really unique and notable, not at the level of say, New York, Chicago deep-dish, or Detroit styles, and some are really not regional styles but the product of one or two individual restaurants. That said, what I said in my edit summary about removing styles just because they don't have their own articles stands. oknazevad (talk) 22:06, 2 September 2023 (UTC)

Oknazevad, I don't disagree, but if it doesn't have an article, at minimum it needs good sources that prove the thing even exists and that someone somewhere is discussing it. I just minutes ago came across this, which while technically a blog is actually articles written by experts on the website of King Arthur Flour, and there is editorial oversight. They're calling it South Shore Bar pizza, any objection to that? Valereee (talk) 13:03, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

Quad City Style Pizza

The Quad City Style Pizza is NOT an Iowa pizza, but most likely originated on the Illinois side of the Quad Cities, probably at Frank's Pizzeria in Silvis, Illinois, or Harris Pizza in Rock Island, Illinois, in the 50's or 60's. I have lived in the Quad Cities most of my life and there are many pizza restaurants that serve the type of pizza in the paragraph, but these places typically serve pizzas prepared very similar to Harris Pizza, therefore known locally as a "Harris Knockoff". I believe the paragraph should be corrected. 216.82.6.46 (talk) 05:29, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

I reworded it to refer to the broader metro area and not Iowa specifically. oknazevad (talk) 17:52, 8 November 2023 (UTC)