Talk:Pola X

Latest comment: 10 months ago by Thanlis in topic Dogma

Maurice Chevalier

edit

Zees article reads like eet woz wreetten by Maurice Chevalier. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.214.9.247 (talk) 09:11, 14 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

zank heaven, for leetle girls ?
Whoa, they'd put Maurice behind bars for the rest of his life today, wouldn't they ? Land of the brave, home of the free, whoo-hoo :) 210.22.142.82 (talk) 12:33, 22 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject class rating

edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 07:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Pola X.jpg

edit
 

Image:Pola X.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:16, 21 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Dogma

edit

Isn't this a Dogma type /inspired film? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.249.232.248 (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are there any RS for that? -- Brangifer (talk) 16:31, 17 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
It clearly isn't. It breaks several of the manifesto rules: "The sound must never be produced apart from the images or vice versa" (there's an orchestral score at several points), "The film must not contain superficial action" (there are weapons, etc.), and "The director must not be credited" (Carax is credited). There are also a few very stylized sequences.
And as Brangifer implies, there's no reliable source making that claim. Thanlis (talk) 19:56, 27 December 2023 (UTC)Reply