Talk:Pondicherry-class minesweeper
Latest comment: 5 years ago by DBigXray in topic Proposed merge with INS Karwar (M67)
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Pondicherry-class minesweeper article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
_without_national_boundaries.svg)
Proposed merge with INS Karwar (M67)
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Not moved (non-admin closure) DBigXrayᗙ 10:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
. This ship belongs to that class. It does not have much different information then already mentioned on that page. It will be easier to make this one page for maintenance. Adamgerber80 (talk) 19:08, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
- Merge Very little content on the article is specific to the ship INS Karwar. —Gazoth (talk) 19:32, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- The remaining two articles on individual ships of the class, INS Pondicherry (M61) and INS Kozhikode (M71) should be merged into this article too for the same reason. —Gazoth (talk) 19:35, 24 March 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose merge(s) on the grounds that warships are usually notable (see WP:MILUNIT). I've also added some material specific to the ship, which was straightforward to find - there seems to be an adequate number of sources to justify independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 09:23, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose for the same reasons as mentioned by Klbrain. Class article and ship article are independently notable and can be expanded based on their own content. --DBigXrayᗙ 10:49, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose ship is individually notable Lyndaship (talk) 11:33, 27 November 2018 (UTC)
- Closing, given the consensus for independent notability. Klbrain (talk) 08:44, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Klbrain, agree please use the template at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Closing_instructions to close this --DBigXrayᗙ 08:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry: there is no close template at your link. Perhaps the following will do. Klbrain (talk) 09:09, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
- Klbrain, agree please use the template at Wikipedia:Requested_moves#Closing_instructions to close this --DBigXrayᗙ 08:56, 2 December 2018 (UTC)
Resolved- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.