A fact from Pooh-pooh appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 April 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 1 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Claudiahan5.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:16, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
Proposed deletion
editRequesting that an administrator delete this page. The so-called pooh-pooh fallacy is more properly termed an ad lapidem fallacy, for which there is a separate page. The pooh-pooh name is a colloquialism. Ad lapidem is the proper term that we use for rubbishing rather than refuting. Flumpswithmumps (talk) 09:27, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest you provide sources that say so. From what I see, you may have a point calling it a hyponym, but it clearly is not a synonym. Notability seems ok.
- You may have better luck with proposing a WP:MERGE and redirect. Paradoctor (talk) 14:09, 29 October 2024 (UTC)