Talk:Poongudi
Latest comment: 4 years ago by Lugnuts in topic Requested move 7 September 2020
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Requested move 7 September 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Page moved. (non-admin closure) Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 18:06, 3 October 2020 (UTC)
Pungudi → Poongudi – Typing "Pungudi" returns 15,500 G-hits whereas "Poongudi" returns more than 34,000 hits. Kailash29792 (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC) Kailash29792 (talk) 03:28, 7 September 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. 2pou (talk) 05:04, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
- G-hits aren't very relevant when all hits are from databases, and G-hits are so unreliable that being within the same order of magnitude means they're about the same. But are we sure these are the same subject? This article on The Hindu discusses a village named Poongudi, but it's in Tiruchirappalli district while this one is in the adjacent Pudukkottai district (from what I gather). – Thjarkur (talk) 10:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support When the common usage is unclear, we can go with the official one. Census of India (p 80) uses Poongudi. --Ab207 (talk) 07:40, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.