Talk:Pratapgarh stampede

Rename

I think the page should be renamed to 2010 Pratapgarh stampede. That's where the accident has happened. UP is the biggest state in India and terming it with state name would cause confusion. --GPPande 14:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Resolved

--candle•wicke 15:43, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

It seems to be misspelled. According to the article it should be "Pratapgarah" not "Pratapgarh." --Notmyhandle (talk) 22:13, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia it should be Pratapgarh. --candle•wicke 19:10, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Minor Point

I saw it used the same way in the media and so it makes sense to see Wikipedia doing this but the use of stampede is not clear. I remember reading the first reports from the Times on this and it wasn't clear whether or not a stampede occurred, a real stampede with bulls, cows, etc. I didn't know if the writer of the Time's article wasn't sure themselves but it was left ambiguous. I would make a simple change from: "An unfinished[8] temple gate fell, which may have led to a panic among the crowd and to the stampede." to "An unfinished temple gate fell, which may have led to a panic among the crowd causing them to stampede." I don't like the original sentence to begin with and I think whoever wrote it was simply trying to incorporate how the newspapers wrote about it, but this makes it clear that it stampede is being used to describe people. The word is a word to describe animal behavior. People don't stampede but we describe them as stampeding in crazy and unfortunate circumstances like what happened in UP.

Like I said nothing major but has been a pet peeve of mine since the story broke.Phail Saph (talk) 08:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Ye a minor point, as are all the crap trashed shit smelling freaks that india produces...63 died? more than a billion more left so no worries.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Pratapgarh stampede. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307122736/http://arabnews.com/world/article25865.ece to http://arabnews.com/world/article25865.ece
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100307050305/http://www.india-server.com/news/prime-minister-announces-compensation-22265.html to http://www.india-server.com/news/prime-minister-announces-compensation-22265.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)