Talk:Princess Lilibet of Sussex

Semi-protected edit request on 15 March 2023

COPIED AND PASTED FROM THE PAGE OF PRINCESS LILIBET OF SUSSEX:-

At the accession of Charles III, Lilibet became entitled to use the title "princess" and style "royal highness"

Although apparently small, this:- "style "royal highness" detail is incorrect, untrue and misleading, so should be deleted in order for the page to be honest & true. This detail was checked with Buckingham Palace - if you require to check, Buckingham Palace can be contact by letter or phone, using the details I post here:-

To contact Buckingham Palace London SW1A 1AA: Telephone (during 9am - 5pm (GMT) Monday to Friday) on: (+44) (0)20 7930 4832. NOTE: calls to this number may be recorded </ref> CobwebCottage (talk) 16:27, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

 Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. Actualcpscm (talk) 17:20, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

I supplied an extremely reliable source: BUCKINGHAM PALACE, LONDON. UK.

I gave you the address and actual telephone number which can be used as a contact to have the information confirmed that Princess Lilibet of Sussex was NOT eligible to use the style of "Royal Highness". Only the title of Princess was given, so therefore she is Princess Lilibet of Sussex - but she is not entitled to use HRH or, Her "Royal Highness".

I supplied the most reliable source possible:- Buckingham Palace, along with their contact number which could be used to confirm the details I've given.

How much more reliable could a source be? CobwebCottage (talk) 18:01, 15 March 2023 (UTC)

an actual source would be required not just "call them yourself and see". Th

The HRH comes with the princess title. 173.212.65.254 (talk) 02:27, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

To clarify a little, please read Wikipedia's core policy Wikipedia:Verifiability.

"Readers must be able to check that any of the information within Wikipedia articles is not just made up. This means all material must be attributable to reliable, published sources. Additionally, quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be supported by inline citations."

'You can phone them and ask' is not a reliable published source so is not acceptable for Wikipedia.

Additionally, the stated assertion contradicts the cited sources in major media publications (who, I would guess, also know how to phone Buckingham Palace), and the fairly clear provisions of the 1917 letters patent ("the children of the sons of [the] Sovereign ... shall have and at all times hold and enjoy the style title or attribute of Royal Highness").

The person answering the phone at Buckingham Palace is not necessarily an expert on British constitutional law. TSP (talk) 11:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 20 January 2024

The correct English title is missing. Change Meghan Markle to Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. 162.255.1.56 (talk) 21:35, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

It's in the second sentence. The infobox uses maiden name. DrKay (talk) 21:39, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

add an image in the infobox

? maybe? QueenAnnaMaria (talk) 17:55, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Images must comply with Wikipedia:Image use policy. There don't appear to be any free-use (i.e. uncopyrighted) images of her available. DrKay (talk) 18:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

unsigned

In the part : 《An 8 March 2023 statement by a spokesperson for Lilibet's parents confirming her baptism days earlier marked the first time that her parents had publicly used her title of "princess", with the announcement referring to her as "Princess Lilibet Diana".》, shouldn't it say: 《An 8 March 2023 statement by a spokesperson for HER parents confirming her baptism days earlier marked the first time that thet had publicly used her title of "birth princess", with the announcement referring to her as "Princess Lilibet Diana of sussex"》— Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.64.103.124 (talk • contribs) 00:16, 17 June 2024 (UTC)

No. "Birth princess" isn't a title. Celia Homeford (talk) 13:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)