Talk:Principles of analogue television
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 24 May 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||
Does this belong elsewhere?
editPlease see Talk:Technology of television to discuss merging this with other TV technology articles.
merge
editI suggest merging the stub vertical synchronization pulse into the "Synchronisation" section of how television works. --68.0.124.33 (talk) 03:30, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Raster screen picture
editGreat picture but I think parts of this image are incorrect. Although it seems strange, the raster scan when drawing is slighly diagonal, and the 'jump' when the electron beam is not drawing is horizontal. In the en wikipedia article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raster_scan#Scanning_pattern it says " Thus each scan line is sloped slightly "downhill" (towards the lower right), with a slope of approximately –1/horizontal resolution, while the sweep back is very rapid and almost horizontal." 89.168.77.135 (talk) 16:52, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
English
edit"Analogue" and "color" on the same page. Only on Wikipedia. --Wtshymanski (talk) 16:19, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
Color carrier is in the video band
editI think the following sentence in section Color TV must be reviewed : In NTSC, the subcarrier is at approximately 3.58 MHz, in PAL it is roughly 4.43 MHz - these are chosen to be above the baseband luminance signal, but below the FM sound carrier. Please refer to System M and System B.In the first case the video bandwidth is 4.2 MHz. which is higher than 3.58 and in the second case the video bandwidth is 5 MHz. which is higher than 4.43.The color carriers are well within the baseband. The trick is that they are so located that the interference between the luminance and the color signal is minimum. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2010 (UTC)
Merge
editI propose merging this article with Analog television. Seems silly to have two articles with such similar names. At the very least, changing the names to that one is clearly technical and the other is clearly non-technical is a possibility (such as Introduction to special relativity vs Special relativity. Dondegroovily (talk) 13:26, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
- No strong opinion on this but leaning to keep separate. You are right to identify this article as descring the technical aspect. I would have tbought that a link from analog television at an appropriate place was all that is needed. SpinningSpark 20:09, 15 September 2010 (UTC)
- They remain separate. I deleted the merge tags and added a disambig style link to the top of each one. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
- Usually a merge tag is left on for more than a couple of days. Leave it for a week or so, see who comments. I think these should be merged under "analog television". --Wtshymanski (talk)
- They remain separate. I deleted the merge tags and added a disambig style link to the top of each one. Dondegroovily (talk) 04:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)