 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Controversy
editI think the word "Controversy" is so strong. that sad story could happen with any other online game addiction. I think sth similar to "story highlight" is better and more neutral.--Nata 99 (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- "Story highlight" is meaningless. What story is it highlighting, exactly? This is an article about a game, and the section is about something that happened because of the game. I think controversy suits it much better. Aiken ♫ 18:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- What about "stories" or "scandals"? I want a neutral word but I cant remember a good word.--Nata 99 (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Incidents? Aiken ♫ 19:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- OK :-) --Nata 99 (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- Incidents? Aiken ♫ 19:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
- What about "stories" or "scandals"? I want a neutral word but I cant remember a good word.--Nata 99 (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
Neutrality
editi don't even have to be a wiki user to know this thing is just an advertisement. make it neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.12.96.247 (talk) 19:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
- I second this.--97.96.26.245 (talk) 10:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)
- I third this. --Seduisant (talk) 03:29, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
Notification for removal of information.
editI challenge the importance of most of the information in this article. For an English-speaking audience, the only thing of importance is the death of the child resulting from an addiction to the game.
A huge, uncited description of a now defunct game is completely needless.Hilltrot (talk) 19:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)