Talk:Progradungula barringtonensis
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Launchballer in topic Did you know nomination
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Progradungula barringtonensis article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from Progradungula barringtonensis appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 31 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Launchballer talk 03:36, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the Australian spider Progradungula barringtonensis has been called a Gondwanan "ghost"?
- Source: Michalik et al. (2024) Article title and Discussion- Biogeography and conservation "However, the small range sizes and disjunct distributions of the three known Progradungula species support theidea that this spider genus is a relict. Progradungula might be an example of Gondwanan rainforest biota that has suffered major extinction and now survives only in a few sheltered habitats."
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Premna microphylla
- Comment: nominated for the Oct 31 Halloween sets
Moved to mainspace by Kevmin (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 361 past nominations.
Kevmin § 16:31, 16 October 2024 (UTC).
New enough, long enough. Hook fact is interesting, supported in article. Spiders and ghosts are a perfect blend for Halloween. No close paraphrasing (Earwig shows 0%). Good to go! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 18:52, 20 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Kevmin and Crisco 1492: Running Ctrl+F through the source, I can only see the word 'ghost' in the WP:HEADLINE, which isn't reliable.--Launchballer 18:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- What is the Specific wording of WP:Reliable that is violated? The wording of headline is specifically targeting news sources, not peer-reviewed publications. The article covers the "ghost" part in the sections I included here about relictual lineages and extinction events.--Kevmin § 20:40, 21 October 2024 (UTC)
- @Kevmin and Crisco 1492: Running Ctrl+F through the source, I can only see the word 'ghost' in the WP:HEADLINE, which isn't reliable.--Launchballer 18:07, 21 October 2024 (UTC)