Talk:Prosperity Bancshares
Latest comment: 14 years ago by Racconish in topic Not a candidate for speedy deletion
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Not a candidate for speedy deletion
editThis article does NOT meet the criteria because:
- I am in the process of adding additional content
- The information was taken from a public document (a Form 10-K), not company advertising.
Quidam65 (talk) 16:21, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- If you're adding additional content, you may want to focus on reliable sources, which are entirely absent in what I see (a company's own press releases and other self-published material do not qualify). There is also the problem of notability; it seems to be implicitly inferred by what you're saying here, but it needs to be explicit. What arm's-length third-party expert sources think this company is notable, and where can we read that opinion? Accounting4Taste:talk 16:33, 12 April 2010 (UTC)
- I realize my mistake. Some info here Racconish Tk 06:08, 13 April 2010 (UTC)