Talk:Pseudochazara hippolyte

Insects Low‑importance

	Insects portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Insects, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of insects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InsectsWikipedia:WikiProject InsectsTemplate:WikiProject InsectsInsects articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lepidoptera Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lepidoptera, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of butterflies and moths on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LepidopteraWikipedia:WikiProject LepidopteraTemplate:WikiProject LepidopteraLepidoptera articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Common name

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

@Fgt7: I saw that you removed the common name. At Markku Savela's Lepidoptera and Some Other Life Forms (here) it says Nevada Grayling. Do you have reason to believe that is wrong? It would really help if you used edit summaries to explain why you are making changes. Thanks, SchreiberBike | ⌨ 21:02, 23 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've changed the redirect, Nevada grayling, to go to Pseudochazara williamsi. I believe that's the intent of your edits, but I'm not sure. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 23:13, 16 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Hello,

> I saw that you removed the common name

yes, the common name "Nevada Grayling" for Pseudochazara hippolyte (an Asian taxon) it is not appropriate now, because "Nevada" comes from "Sierra Nevada" (S. Spain), where it only exists the taxon Pseudochaza williamsi (formerly considered a subspecies of P. hippolyte, but now it's regarded as a different species). Conclusion: "Nevada Grayling" = P. williamsi

Regards

Add topic