Talk:Pulickel Ajayan

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Prod

edit

I based it off the professor test: If the individual is more well known and more published than an average college professor (based on the U.S. practice of calling all full-time academics professors), they can and should be included. He seems to me to be an average college professor. (A popular one, perhaps, going on the comment above mine.) There's no shame in that, and, because I am not an expert in the field, I won't bother taking this farther - so no harm done? My suggestion, however, would be to change, at least, the lead. "Pulickel Ajayan, Ph.D. is a professor of Materials Engineering at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute" make absolutely no assertion of notability, even if the body of the article does make some unverified, unsourced claims. zafiroblue05 | Talk 22:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ok, done. Also listed selected honors for notability. Danski14 21:34, 10 January 2007 (UTC)Reply


Professor Pulickel Ajayan is one between the main scientist working in the field of carbon nanotubes, with a quite long list of publications and citations. However the widely criteria to base the real value of a scientist on the number of publication and publication metric factors (as the h-factor for example) is extremely controversial and discussed. Concerning prof. Ajayan to this long list of publication do not correspond any fundamental major progress in the field of nanotubes but a long list of "routine" works as for many other senior scientist. It is for these reasons I don't consider opportune to conserve anymore this article on the pages of Wikipedia.

I disagree. Ajayan meets WP:PROF. Check the criteria.

He has a chaired position, mainstream independent news coverage, a few notable awards, and the research. These factors alone are enough to justify inclusion. Perhaps the article is not perfectly netutral when it comes to the actual significance of his work, but it should not be deleted. Danski14(talk) 19:29, 18 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Pulickel Ajayan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:20, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Pulickel Ajayan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 24 December 2017 (UTC)Reply