This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Page moved. Clear case for WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. -- Hadal (talk) 14:04, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
Qingyuan, Guangdong → Qingyuan – relisting to generate more discussion ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 04:47, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
1) A prefecture-level city, which is 2nd order, should be the primary topic over any county-level division, be it a county or district, which are 3rd order. See Administrative divisions of China for an overview.
2) Article traffic as of this post
- Qingyuan, Guangdong: 324
- Mount Qingyuan: 109
- Qingyuan County, Hebei: 78
- Qingyuan County, Zhejiang: 49
- Qingyuan Manchu Autonomous County: 60
- Qingyuan District: 35
- Qingyuan, Qingyuan Manchu Autonomous County: 23
- Qingyuan, Yizhou: 29
3) Searches on Google Books (quotation marks or no) for this Qingyuan under "Qingyuan City" and "Qingyuan Guangdong" yield a combined 5540 results. A search for "Qingyuan County", which gives results for all three counties named Qingyuan gives 2120 results. Split that number for each of the different counties, and that number declines. "Qingyuan District Ji'an" gives 199 results. For the mountain: "Mount Qingyuan", "Qingyuanshan", "Qingyuan Mountain" yield a combined 1374 results. I don't even have to mention the towns.
Clearly, nothing comes even close to Qingyuan City. Adding DAB-bing qualifiers to the titles of Jining (Shandong) and Ji'an (Jiangxi), and perhaps more cases, should never have happened for the same reasons listed as above. –HXL's Roundtable and Record 15:33, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support. The logic here seeems sound. The disambiguation page that is currently at Qingyuan should be moved to Qingyuan (disambiguation) or something similar, and a hatnote placed at the top of this article after moving to direct readers to that disambiguation page.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Danaman5 (talk • contribs) 05:59, 14 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support. Both sources and traffic indicate, and policy supports, that this prefecture-level city is the primary topic for Qingyuan. Quigley (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support. All evidence above proves that this city is the primary topic. Jenks24 (talk) 12:09, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Coordinate error
edit{{geodata-check}}
The following coordinate fixes are needed for
—59.32.148.58 (talk) 00:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
- Coordinates tweaked. Deor (talk) 12:56, 14 March 2012 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Qingyuan. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120406235110/http://www.luqyu.cn/tongjishow.asp?tid=946 to http://www.luqyu.cn/tongjishow.asp?tid=946
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20060829080224/http://www.qywjm.gov.cn:80/ to http://www.qywjm.gov.cn/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:45, 21 July 2016 (UTC)
To add to article
editTo add to article: what it borders. 173.88.241.33 (talk) 03:35, 31 May 2018 (UTC)