Talk:Queen of Soul: The Atlantic Recordings

Footnotes 2 and 3 have been hacked and are now links to buy.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.114.23.176 (talk) 22:59, 7 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

It looks to me that the editor who created the article may have hid his own affiliate-seller urls within Village Voice etc links. (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Queen_of_Soul:_The_Atlantic_Recordings&diff=135037988&oldid=135033171). - leading to buy.com directly. Otherwise why do it? To link to cited reviews? It's not impossible I suppose. It was probably an expensive thing to buy, but I don't think the box set is in print any more. I've had a quick look through his contributions and I can't see evidence of it happening again, and he's not editing now it appears.
I do wonder sometimes exactly how much money people make from this place either linking directly to their own businesses, via clever citing, or through affiliate selling. You used to see it a lot if you knew where/how to look - ie in the 99% of Wikipedia that exists outside of its core articles. I think even 'Veteran' editors constantly move these kind of links around the articles without ever checking them - even when they can actually see the url they've moved, like here. That's what gets me - the lack of importance held in checking (or even validating) links after they've initially been created. Matt Lewis (talk) 03:47, 20 February 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Queen of Soul: The Atlantic Recordings. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:37, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Rhino Records release is not a reissue of the original release by Atlantic Records

edit

I made some basic changes that eliminate the statements that the Rhino release is a reissue of the Atlantic release. I also corrected the track listing of the Rhino release (by inserting "Don't Let Me Lose This Dream" as track 6 of disc 1).

What really needs to happen, however, is to create a completely new Wikipedia page for the Rhino Records release, and to move its cover art and track listing to the new page.

SlotAndSplit (talk) 08:44, 31 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have begun work on a new article for the Rhino release. At present, the draft is in my sandbox: User:SlotAndSplit/sandbox SlotAndSplit (talk) 02:56, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The new article has been posted as a draft.
Draft:The Queen of Soul (2014 Aretha Franklin album)
If and when it passes review, and has been officially published, I will strip out its artwork and track listing from this article.
SlotAndSplit (talk) 23:24, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply