This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the REC Limited article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editThis article was originally written by several now banned sockpupetts presumable paid editors. There were previous attempts at cleanup, but not only were they unwisely reverted, but more drastic work is necessary. (This is not unusual in articles that had their origin in a succession of several undeclared paid editors--they each add their own share of the promotionalism ) I have removed extensive duplciation from the initial sections, and reorganized them logically. I also removed various phrases of praise and importance that should have been removed much earlier. This is a partial edit only- I have not yet gotten to the history section and later parts of the article.
I suppose I should mention that if it can not be successfully cleaned, only alternative to deletion will be stubbification. DGG ( talk ) 03:44, 23 September 2017 (UTC)