| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Raj Kundra article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened: |
Recent IP contributions
editI have recently reverted some contribution by an IP editor. WP:Overlink means that we do not include items in a "See also" section which are already linked in the body of the article. There is also no need for the Super Fight League infobox: itserves little purpose here and we link to the league article in any event. Similarly, logos of the SFL and Lions seem to me to be at best trivial in this context. - Sitush (talk) 08:53, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
Net worth
editI've just removed a statement of his net worth. The source quite obviously got its biographical information from our article and its figure for net worth was couched in extremely speculative terms. I admit to not being a fan of these net worth figures anyway because even the supposed best of them, eg: Forbes and The Sunday Times Rich List, are pretty much guesswork and veer wildly from one year to the next, but the source on this occasion is one that I've never even heard of. Is it really ok? - Sitush (talk) 10:16, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
DOB
editWe seem to be missing date of birth information here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.197.100.47 (talk) 19:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)
Need to keep an eye on this
editI think there has been a fair amount of whitewashing going on for this article, which I have just tried to fix. I also suspect that the wide coverage of the alleged bitcoin scam last June will rear its head again. I deliberately haven't put anything in about those allegations because there may be WP:BLP issues but there will be a fair few people who won't have a clue and may be attracted to this article when he is next in the news. - Sitush (talk) 11:24, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Controversy section
editHi @Gatri8pe, why did you undid my edit without giving any explanation? The addition of this controversy clearly violates WP:BLPCRIME. Eevee01(talk) 05:20, 7 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi@User talk:Eevee01, since he is involved in the making of pornographic movies which are banned in India, and is facing a court case, why should others do not know about it. What is your intention to hide this very fact? In fact, you unnecessarily reverted the reality and promoting him as a saint, which he is not. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gatri8pe (talk • contribs) 11:31, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- Hi @Gatri8pe, as mentioned above, adding this to his biography violates WP:BLPCRIME. Accusations, investigations and arrests do not amount to a conviction. If he is found guilty in the court then you can add it to the article. Eevee01(talk) 12:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Gatri8pe If you want a second opinion then you can visit WP:TEA, and ask if this content should be added to this article or not. Eevee01(talk) 12:18, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
Hi @User:Eevee01 I have gone through WP:BPLCRIMES and it does state that facts with references can be put. All the information is backed up by references. So, there is no need to change it unless you are getting paid by Raj Kundra himself or his allies to keep his profile checked. Do not revert it back as the addition does not cite him in bad light but states only the current affairs. There are many article where all such kind of information is added in many celebs, so if you are so much concerned with it, go and change for each and everybody. I am UNDOing what you have done. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gatri8pe (talk • contribs) 17:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Gatri8pe see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions/Archive_1129#Deletion_of_contribution_that_is_verified. I am not the only Wikipedia editor here. If other editors feel that the information can be added and a WP:CONSENSUS is reached then I don't have any problem with you or someone else adding the information. Even if you add the information you can't mention it in lead section or write full paragraphs after paragraphs on it. It'll give in WP:UNDUE weight to this event. Eevee01(talk) 03:52, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
- @Gatri8pe I've requested a third opinion. Eevee01(talk) 07:09, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
 Response to third opinion request:
|
This sounds like a clear BLP violation and an administator deemed it aggregious enough to be removed, so I can't even see what it was. But obviously a conviction has not been secured, so including the allegation is a blatant violation of WP:BLPCRIME. ––FormalDude  talk 09:09, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
|