This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Although even a minor film actor is in a sense a public figure, a very minor criminal case is not sufficiently significant in their overall career to be a prominent part of a bio. DGG ( talk ) 16:14, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
@DGG: Given that the subject just passes the borderline of notability so I think that comparing his notability with the coverage this criminal case has got, I think two sources are enough for a brief addition of that criminal case as this sort of Indian actors don't get much coverage. Although we can remove things on request by the subject if no one disagree but here I disagree as the article is full of his establishment. Sourced critism will balance the article. So, what you think @DGG should I add it? Both the sources are reliable. JimCarter(from public cyber)18:56, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
I already gave my opinion. He would be notable without it, and it's irrelevant to his career. For all I know, he thinks that any publicity is good publicity, but I think we have somewhat different standards. But I'm not abou to fight the issue. DGG ( talk ) 22:37, 9 October 2014 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
