Talk:Ramankutty Nair

Citations needed?

For a one-line stub followed by four source links needs citations? Doesn't seem to be tagged for right reasons. I am removing the tag, as it's looking like the singular most inappropriate tag on WP. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 05:36, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

Once again User:NAHID uses the edit summary instead of the talk page, even when there was an explicit request. This person has found out quite a few loopholes in the policies, and making good use of them to troll me. Its kind of irritating. I hope he starts concentrating more on the articles he explicitly declared to be developing. Sigh. Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 05:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

• I don't see your explicit request here (no need for that). "Legendary performer" - this peacock word, either remove it or provide a reference. That you have already provided by altering them ("Legendary performer" to "Prominent performer" [1]). Added citation tag isn't trolling. And also, beware about your edit summary that you labelled as trolling. Don't do that.--NAHID 20:19, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

More attention?

The article now has quite a bit of good stuff on it. Only it needs a thorough rewrite and ample citations. Any takers? Aditya^{(talk • contribs)} 14:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)

Introduction

It looks like everyone has put some work into rewrites, but what about section headings.GarbledLecture933 (talk) 02:40, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

• fixed — Preceding unsigned comment added by GarbledLecture933 (talk • contribs) 02:43, 27 October 2011 (UTC)