Talk:Ramparts (magazine)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ramparts (magazine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Comment
editSince there is no other entry for the term ramparts why don't we rename this article Ramparts? -- Viajero 19:35, 22 May 2004 (UTC)
More info?
editWhy was it called Ramparts and why did it close?--Jack Upland 05:53, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
- According to former executive editor Warren Hinckle, founder Edward Keating thought Ramparts was "a terrifically symbolic name because it could mean either defending the Church from the ramparts against secular attack, or Catholic intellectuals striking forth at the world with their ideas, from the ramparts" (If You Have a Lemon, Make Lemonade, p. 36). --Peter Richardson 04:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
- The magazine shut down twice for lack of funds--once briefly in 1969 while they reorganized under Chapter XI, and for the final time in 1975. The first time, circulation was quite high but the costs outstripped the revenue. They began republishing again in April 1969 and trimmed costs substantially. The second time, circulation had fallen below 60,000--a fraction of its peak.
- http://www.insecure.org/stf/hacker_crackdown.txt says they closed after they published a blue box schematic and the feds seized and ruined their shit. The bad publicity and confiscated equipment cut too deeply into their sales. But that book could be wrong, and I can't be arsed verifying it right now. Maybe later. 72.40.101.236 22:43, 29 May 2006 (UTC)
Copyright issues
editThis article is largely based on an article in Folio, which I've linked to on the main page. It probably came to Wikipedia by way of this article on Sourcewatch wiki. On SourceWatch, the source was at least acknowledged. The last paragraph is the real problem - its a direct cut-and-paste from the original copyrighted source article. Peter G Werner 23:47, 6 June 2006 (UTC)
Vietnam veteran Don Duncan was military editor for Ramparts and gained strong media coverage for that.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_W._Duncan Mike Kolvenbach (talk) 19:35, 24 August 2012 (UTC)
CIA financed Ramparts?
editAccording to the following source, the CIA actually financed Ramparts, could that be possible? Can this article address this issue? Here: Cord Meyer (1980). Facing Reality: From World Federalism to the CIA. pp. 86–89. --192.223.243.6 (talk) 18:06, 5 April 2013 (UTC)
Sevendays
editSevendays magazine appeared in the mid-70's shortly after Ramparts' demise and openly stated that it was attempting to carry on the legacy. It put out a few monthly issues and might have gotten to biweekly for a little while; it admitted that the title was mostly aspirational, but it attempted to be a high-quality, glossy lefty magazine aimed at least a somewhat young, somewhat hip audience, something that The Nation of that (or maybe any) era could never do. I would guess that it was 1976-1978 or something like this; I don't know any area libraries that have it in their bound periodicals now, but it either needs its own, linked article or at least a section here, but someone would need the resources to research it, which I lack. 2600:1004:B104:6E3A:F0C4:B6F9:6683:8256 (talk) 02:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
Moved from article
editThis article is grossly deficient in that it fails to mention the major role played by Ramparts in 1966-67 by exposing the activities of the Central Intelligence Agency in the funding and infiltration of American and Foreign student, youth, labor and press organizations.[1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nsaer (talk • contribs) 04:08, September 7, 2014
- A great deal of significant content is now missing from this article, including a list of important contributors. Because a lot of research went into my book about the magazine, I tried to monitor this page for a while, but really, life is too short. Peter Richardson (talk) 13:11, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
JFK
editThe article states:
- Ramparts also unearthed the first conspiracy theory about the Kennedy assassination.
However, according to John F. Kennedy assassination conspiracy theories (which doesn't mention Ramparts at all):
- Among conspiracy theorists, Mark Lane has been described as writing "the first literary shot" with his article, "Defense Brief for Oswald," in the December 19, 1963, edition of the National Guardian.--Jack Upland (talk) 02:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Ramparts (magazine). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110518172208/http://amconmag.com/article/2010/jan/01/00044/ to http://www.amconmag.com/article/2010/jan/01/00044/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:13, 5 September 2017 (UTC)