Welcome!

edit

Hello, Mike Kolvenbach, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Donald Duncan (war protester), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Bihco (talk) 05:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply


Hello, Bihco,

as far as I know I included 2 references to Don Duncan, one is an original source and another is a scholarl monograph in which Duncan is mentioned.

Mike Kolvenbach (talk) 06:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Donald Duncan (war protester)

edit
 

The article Donald Duncan (war protester) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Bihco (talk) 05:45, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Donald Duncan (war protester)

edit
 

The article Donald Duncan (war protester) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:23, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Donald Duncan (war protester) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Donald Duncan (war protester) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Donald Duncan (war protester) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Hi Mike

edit

I've started working a bit on the Donald Duncan piece. Feel free to help in if you'd like.

I'll also point out that you have the right to voice your opinion on whether the piece should be kept or deleted at the deletion debate at AfD, a link to which appears above. I'd encourage you to do that, one way or the other.

If you need any help with the Wikipedia software or have any questions, feel free to either leave a message on my talk page (the link follows my name below) or you may contact me directly by email: MutantPop@aol.com

Best regards, —Tim Davenport, Corvallis, OR //// Carrite (talk) 17:25, 21 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Stephen Petraeus

edit
 

The article Stephen Petraeus has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this newly created biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 15:55, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Stephen Petraeus for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stephen Petraeus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stephen Petraeus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. --v/r Electric Catfish (talk) 15:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)Reply