Talk:Rangers Strike

Untitled

Does anybody else think that Kamen Rider Blade is improperly categorized? I think it should be in Mystic Arms. ````

I think they make it on purpose, because the Wild Beast team is the smallest, and in need of more members. In my opinion, Gekiranger also should be in Mystic Arms, since their powers are not given by the beasts, but come from their fighting style.

lists

The listing of all the cards or characters (I can't even tell from context which it is, or if its both) seems too cumbersome. If it is not cleaned up and presented in an encyclopedic fasion (so that everyone can understand what it is saying) it will be removed. This article also needs to state wheter this game has only been printed in Japanese, or if its been printed in english as well.Mathman1550 (talk) 17:08, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Since no one has objected I will be removing and editing the lengthy listings. Please do not revert the edits without a discussion here, since you already had a chance to object. Mathman1550 (talk) 17:22, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Do not edit the article without discussion here. If you believe the lengthy lists I removed are important, put them in a new article with a link from this article and add explanations of what they are. I could not even tell what the lists were of. For the content to be encyclopedic, it needs to be written in a way so that anyone reading the article will understand what it is. As it was, there was no explanation nor justification of why that content should be in the article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mathman1550 (talk • contribs) 17:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

There is no reason for the lists to not be there. They are there to show what group is covered by which categorization in the game. That, and you cannot say who can and cannot edit an article. The information is encyclopedic, so leave it in.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 21:31, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I can tell you not to edit when a dispute should first be discussed on the talk page. You have not justified having the material in the article, nor have you edited the article so that those unfamiliar with the subject will be able to understand it. Since you were unwilling to discuss the dispute here before continuing to edit, I will be requesting WP:Editor Assistance Mathman1550 (talk) 22:06, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

I've edited the article such that the information is clearer. Editor assistance is in no way necessary. I've replaced the content and attempted to make the purpose of the lists existance clearer to the casual reader. This is all an overreaction, and the content you removed is not "unencyclopedic rantings." It is a list of television series whose characters are covered by the games' categorizations.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 22:25, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Third opinion

I came here due to a request on the Wikipedia:Third opinion page. I personally have no problem with the lengthy lists, especially since most of the items appear to have their own Wikipedia articles, it's appropriate.

What I don't like is that when I come to this article, unfamiliar with the subject, I can scroll halfway through it and still have absolutely no clue what the article is about or why I should care! It's hardly what I'd call compelling prose.

The short lead paragraph neither summarizes the game nor explains why it's notable enough to warrant an encyclopedia article. A reader who wants to know more is immediately confronted with lists that haven't been given any meaning or context.

I suggest the authors approach this article from the viewpoint of someone unfamiliar with this game (or even this type of game). Expand the lead with relevant facts (not the irrelevant relationships shown now), and re-organize the article so that a reader gains an understanding of the object of the game and its basic rules (without getting into too much detail) before getting into the minute details of the lists. Just changing the order of the sections would help, for starters. ~Amatulić (talk) 22:58, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for responding so quickly, and for your input. Mathman1550 (talk) 23:11, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

So, back to my very first comment here, was the game only produced in Japanese, or in English as well? If both, when in each language? Also, please fill in the infobox. Mathman1550 (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2008 (UTC)

An English version was released in the US as Power Rangers Collectible Card Game. It didn't last long, and has been discontinued. I'm surprised this question wasn't answered before. PRCCG should probably be added to the Rangers Strike article, since they share the artwork. Digifiend (talk) 17:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)

I thought it was pretty obvious that it was Japanese. Also, Digifiend, you have to be careful and realize that the last comment was from over a year and a half ago.—Ryūlóng (竜龙) 20:10, 22 October 2009 (UTC)