This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Copyedit template
editI have restored the {{copyedit}} template to the article, as it obviously needs copy-editing and none of the other issues would hinder such copy-editing in any way. Please remember that our primary purpose is to build an encyclopedia, not to achieve targets for template-removal. Phil Bridger (talk) 13:45, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Why would one want to bother copyediting an article that may get deleted? Allens (talk | contribs) 23:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)