This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Horror, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to fictional horror in film, literature and other media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.HorrorWikipedia:WikiProject HorrorTemplate:WikiProject Horrorhorror articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Westerns, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Western genre on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WesternsWikipedia:WikiProject WesternsTemplate:WikiProject WesternsWesterns articles
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
– This film is not well-known enough, nor was it commercially successful enough, to qualify as the primary topic for the plain title. Virtually the only identifiable reason I can locate for the 1999 film having the undabbed title is that it was the earliest article to get created — I can find no strong evidence that it outstrips any of the other Ravenouses in comparative notability. Bearcat (talk) 18:16, 17 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Support per nomination. There are 7 titles listed upon the disambiguation page (with an additional 3 under "See also"), thus requiring an even greater burden of proof for any one entry to lay claim as the primary topic. —Roman Spinner(talk)(contribs)20:59, 18 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.