Talk:Refusing to assist a police officer

Article a little too UK/USA specific

Are there similar provisions that one must assist a law enforcement officer in other common law/Anglosphere nations like Canada, Australia, New Zealand, ect.? If so, it should be mentioned in the article. 2601:8C:4101:C7C2:646D:FE82:2708:5FD4 (talk) 01:52, 10 December 2015 (UTC)

Further sections needed

Maryland - only case law so far and text relates to traffic only possibly DC leopheard (talk) 08:57, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Tennessee - citation is stale, and the link suggests that it refers not to Tennessee state code, but to a local ordinance for a particular city. I have been unable to find a replacement citation in TN State Code, and that may mean that Tennessee has no such law, other than the particulars of various municipalities by ordinance. I would suggest that if we cannot find a better citation that Tennessee be deleted from the article. Corydon76 (talk) 14:58, 24 July 2018 (UTC)

The citations (and maybe even the text) appear to have been added by a bot. I can't imagine that a human would use "Error" for the title of a source. And most parts of the page are just copy-pasted from other sites (if not simply scrapped, as the formatting and unrelated text were also copied into the article). Nakonana (talk) 16:53, 13 October 2023 (UTC)

Is maintaining a list of every occurrence of the law even important? Instead, it might be more valuable to go over the general breadth of the law as defined in courts which would be more valable (ex. Police can't make unreasonable/dangerous requests or the fact that this is the law that lets police commandeer cars). Chair eater (talk) 11:04, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Refusing to assist a police officer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Replaced archive link http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:lRsJMFV-hIMJ:www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c015.php+&cd=3&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=us with https://web.archive.org/web/20160930180212/http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c015.php on http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c015.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:21, 24 May 2017 (UTC)