Talk:Reg Saunders/GA1

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Ian Rose in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Thurgate (talk · contribs) 18:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply


GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    prose:   (MoS):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
     
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions): 
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

Comments

edit

1. Saunders was demobilised and returned to civilian life. Suggest - you reword this eg. Saunders retired or something along those lines

2. Saunders determined. Suggest - Saunders was determined

3. one of sons. Suggest - one of his sons

I've put the article on hold for seven days to allow you to address the issues I've brought up. Feel free to contact me on my talk page, or here with any concerns. Thurgate (talk) 18:32, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Passed. Good job Ian and Rupert. Thurgate (talk) 00:21, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
Tks Thurgate! Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2012 (UTC)Reply