Talk:Reigning Still

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Thebiguglyalien in topic GA Review
Good articleReigning Still has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starReigning Still is part of the Regine Velasquez concerts series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 4, 2023Good article nomineeListed
June 10, 2024Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Reigning Still/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Thebiguglyalien (talk · contribs) 17:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply


I should have a review for this posted some time today. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 17:01, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Pseud 14, I've posted the review below. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 21:10, 3 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Well-written
  • The lead should say what days the concert took place on.
Added. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • with a show title called – Can this be reworded? "title called" feels off.
Just used "titled" instead. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • revealed her uncertainty should be reworded.
Done. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • The quote doesn't really make sense in this context. This one might be my last makes sense, but it's unclear what And more importantly, if people would still want to see me in a concert like [this] four years from now is referring to.
Tweaked this part. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • The concert was aired as a television special – This would still be correct without "was". It would just change it from passive to active.
Done. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Verifiable with no original research

All sources appear to be reliable.

Spot checks:

  • [1] Panaligan – This source says three music videos, not four.
Source [2] which is cited, is the media/album itself, as this includes the fourth music video on the disc/liner notes, which is not mentioned in source [1] Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • [3] Umerez –  Y
  • [5] Manila Bulletin – Could you quote the part that supports During rehearsals and preparations for the show, she revealed her uncertainty staging an arena concert for its physical demands and cost.
Stated in source [1], should be added now, it is mentioned in Tagalog Nakakapagod na din kasi mag-concert aside sa magastos which translates to, It's draning/exhausting to do concerts, apart from being expensive, and later she says Besides, di ko alam kung kakayanin ko pa physically mag-concert taon-taon. Siguro, every four years na lang at kung gusto pa ng tao, which translates to her being unsure of doing concerts annually because physical demands, opting to only do it every four years. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • [6] Tariman
    • It's not exactly the same thing to say that she "had a say" versus being present in the meetings. It's better to just present the fact presented by the source. The fact also isn't something that would need to be attributed.
Reworded to "was involved". Removed attribution. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
    • I don't see where it calls her the creative director.
Removed. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
    • The producers, sponsors, and guests listed do not match the source.
This source list the guest accordingly, not sure what doesn't match. For sponsors, I only selected Smart Communications, as it is a major sponsor, and the others are minor ones. I've added the media source to support the co-production between GMA Network as a broadcast partner and Aria (which is already mentioned in the source). Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Broad in its coverage

Reception is not covered in the article. Surely someone commented on her performance, in English, Filipino, or otherwise.

I've tried searching for reviews online, i.e. through Google Books or news organizations. Unfortunately, there seems to be no available reviews, so I excluded reception. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  Neutral

No neutrality issues.

  Stable

No disputes, no reason the article will need to be rewritten in the near future.

  Illustrated

The image has a valid non-free use rationale and a suitable caption.

Thanks for taking up the review Thebiguglyalien. Responses provide to your comments. Let me know if I might have missed anything. Pseud 14 (talk) 01:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I was also unable to find any sources for reception. I'm satisfied with all of the other changes, so I'll designate this as a good article now. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 01:32, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.