Talk:Republic of Kosova

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

merge

edit

Please see Talk:Socialist Autonomous Province of Kosovo#merge. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:16, 26 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Title

edit

Kosovo and Metohija is commonly used name in English language sources. Serbian "Kosovo and Metohia" 1990 has only 64 hits in GBS. The article should be renamed per wp:common.--Antidiskriminator (talk) 12:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this article were renamed to Kosovo i Metohija, then the pov-fork currently at that title would have to be merged back into Kosovo. Your plan is flawless, and I support it wholeheartedly. bobrayner (talk) 21:10, 18 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Kosovo i Metohija. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:31, 14 January 2016 (UTC)Reply