Talk:Revolution of the Daleks

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Revolution of the Daleks article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus.

Doctor Who Mid‑importance

	Doctor Who portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Yorkshire Low‑importance

	Yorkshire portal Revolution of the Daleks is within the scope of WikiProject Yorkshire, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Yorkshire on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project, see a list of open tasks, and join in discussions on the project's talk page.YorkshireWikipedia:WikiProject YorkshireTemplate:WikiProject YorkshireYorkshire articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Conflicting views on how Wikipedia decides what is companion or not

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

A recent edit on this article has added a hidden note saying do not add Jack to Companion section of infobox unless credited in opening titles.

However, at Talk:The Empty Child#Captain Jack, Companion or not?, the discussion we had clearly ends with the fact that whether a character is companion or not is down to sources and reliable citations NOT down to opening titles because “basing anything on opening titles is original research”. This is exactly the opposite of what’s been said on the hidden note.

So which of these two arguments follows Wikipedia Guidelines and therefore which of these articles is wrong and needs to be edited?

Panda815 (talk) 12:43, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Consensus of WP:TV is that anyone credited in the main opening credits is main cast (i.e., for Doctor Who in particular, that would mean Doctor or Companion), and that anyone else credited in the closing credits are recurring and/or guest cast. WikiProject consensus overrules a minor discussion that two editors contributed to.

If, however, sources state otherwise, then yes, we use those, as verfiable sources then (typically, but not always) overrule a community consensus. However, no source has been provided stating that Harkness is a companion in this particular 2021 episode. -- /Alex/₂₁ 12:49, 26 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

I have indeed restored Barrowman to the Companion cast based on his opening credits inclusion. However, the rest of my above post remains true. -- /Alex/₂₁ 20:08, 1 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

query

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion

Why is this page un-editable? It can't be a controversial topic, the show aired yesterday only. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.222.115 (talk) 17:15, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's due to significant vandalism, such as repeated insults directed at Chibnall in the plot section before a plot summary had been written. The protection is only for 48 hours and you can make edit requests on this talk page, ideally by saying "this portion wikitext should be replaced by this next text [for this reason if (non-obvious)]". Ping me and I'll be happy to respond ASAP. — Bilorv (talk) 19:13, 2 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

If, however, the vandalism continues after those 48 hours, I'll be requesting RPP to reinstate the protection (the next level is a week, I think). -- /Alex/₂₁ 01:17, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

"Ood stories" and "Weeping angel stories" templates?

Latest comment: 3 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion

Someone added the Ood stories and Weeping Angel Stories templates to the bottom of the article. I'm just wondering why that is? I don't recall the Ood or Weeping Angels appearing in this episode. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 15:54, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

They appear in the prison, along with a Silent, a Pting, and, I believe, a Sycorax. DonQuixote (talk) 17:26, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh, right. I don't know if that counts as a story though. ―JochemvanHees (talk) 18:01, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's a minor appearance. However, it really should be mentioned in the article proper, although I know we're not keen on continuity sections these days for good reason... a note from the plot section, maybe? U-Mos (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic