Talk:Richard D. James Album
Latest comment: 1 month ago by Cambial Yellowing in topic No original research
 | Richard D. James Album has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
B-class
editHow much work does this article need to reach B-class? I can't find any reliable sources about copies sold, background or release. – electricController 15:48, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- To get it to be B-class, I would suggest posting the album at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Albums/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and note you are looking for a B-class review, someone will take a peak at it from there. Andrzejbanas (talk) 17:51, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Andrzejbanas: Thank you. – electricController 18:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Great work on taking a step forward on this article. I think its looking fairly good but I'd suggest we combine the smaller sections unless you think they will be expanded further. Sections that are only one paragraph or less long usually look "unfinished" even if its all the information we can get. I often combine "release and reception" sections if the albums I review don't really chart or get re-released or whatever. Might be an idea here, but no real pressure. Great work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks! Great suggestion. – electricController 18:11, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- Not a problem. Great work on taking a step forward on this article. I think its looking fairly good but I'd suggest we combine the smaller sections unless you think they will be expanded further. Sections that are only one paragraph or less long usually look "unfinished" even if its all the information we can get. I often combine "release and reception" sections if the albums I review don't really chart or get re-released or whatever. Might be an idea here, but no real pressure. Great work! Andrzejbanas (talk) 18:10, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
- @Andrzejbanas: Thank you. – electricController 18:07, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
No original research
editThe source "hit music" says "first taste of American success" which does not support the inaccurate claim that it is the first album to chart. please do not edit war to add original research to the article. Cambial — foliar❧ 17:33, 22 September 2024 (UTC)