Talk:Richard D. James Album/GA1

Latest comment: 1 day ago by Chchcheckit in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: LunaEclipse (talk · contribs) 00:14, 22 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Chchcheckit (talk · contribs) 16:32, 3 September 2024 (UTC)Reply


I'll get to this pretty soon.

GA review
(see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar):  
    b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (references):  
    b (citations to reliable sources):  
    c (OR):  
    d (copyvio and plagiarism):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):  
    b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  

Overall:
Pass/Fail:  

  ·   ·   ·  

Well-written

  • The reception section is good. Currently looking through other parts.
  • I feel that the Release section should be rejigged; Music & Media (cited in sales box) notes how it was Warp Records best-selling release at that point with 100,000 copies sold, and this 1997 interview decipts RDJ's suprise at this. Also; the chart information mentioned in the lead should be referenced in the "release section" as well.
  • Would it be better to have a "release history" table at the bottom of the article instead of small references to reissues? And then to format it to "release and reception?
  •  Y no pagenumbers for Kirn 2011? (appears to have been fixed)

Accuracy/Verifiability/Spotchecks

  • The "Usage In Media" section mostly appears to be original research (WP:OR) save for the references on "4" and "Girl/Boy Song" which could be better incorporated into the article (i'm still writing so give me a second to explain myself)
  •  Y Chart info about not charting as high is citing UK charts; WP:OR
  • earwig copyvio checks out.
  • put in the electronic beats article for media whilelisting review, i'll see where that goes but there should be no issues

Broad

  • Has points for all relevant areas
  • see below: sales milestone is not rlly covered in article as it is (as of september 9 at 1:33pm utc)

NPOV

  • pending, reception is good though

Stability

  • Appears to be since August 22.

Illustrations/Images

  • Artwork and images of plug n Squarepusher are all appropriately rationaled; no problems there.
  •   Done "4" audio sample appears to be 10 seconds too long per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Music samples, but it passed review. (states that 10% of song should be used. "4" is 3:37 or 217 seconds long, and 10% of that is 21.7 seconds) Not sure about this one, I'll ponder.

Going through still // Chchcheckit (talk) 14:25, 5 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@LunaEclipse any comments? Chchcheckit (talk) 11:45, 7 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Tried to come up with a few of my own writing ideas regarding part of the lead and the entire reception section, cause if in lead they should be mentioned in the body of text as well.

Second para of lead:

  • Richard D. James Album reached number 62 on the UK Albums Chart and became James' first album to chart in the United States, at number 20 on Billboard's Top Heatseekers Albums chart; by 1997, it had sold 100,000 copies worldwide, becoming Warp's most successful release. It received acclaim from music critics, and has since been described as one of the best albums of 1996 and the 1990s overall by music critics.

Release:

  • Richard D. James Album was released through Warp on 4 November 1996.[23] It was released in the United States by Sire Records on 28 January 1997;[24] the American version included the Girl/Boy EP as bonus tracks.[25] The album was released on compact disc, cassette and gramophone record;[26] early copies of the album were distributed with a plastic sachet containing James' hair.[27] On 16 November 1996, The album debuted at number 62 on the UK Albums Chart and number 7 on the UK Dance Albums Chart.[28][29] The album became James' first album to chart in the US, debuting at number 20 on Billboard's Top Heatseekers Albums chart.[24] By late 1997, the album had sold 100,000 copies worldwide, becoming Warp's most successful release.[30] James was suprised by the album's sales figures, calling them "pretty bizzare".[31]
  • the "first to chart in the US" is supported by this source

hhh. Chchcheckit (talk) 13:07, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

@LunaEclipse article is doing pretty good so far, but lead and sales mention needs fixing for article to go to GA Chchcheckit (talk) 12:50, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply