Talk:Richardson Island
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
![]() | A fact from Richardson Island appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
| ![]() |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 07:27, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
... that Richardson Island was the subject of an "annexation war" between two cities in the 1950s?Source:
"Corte Madera 'Peace Feeler' Next Step In Annexation War". Daily Independent Journal. San Rafael, California. 1950-08-16. p. 1.
"Corte Madera OKs One Annexation, Rejects 4 Others". Daily Independent Journal. San Rafael, California. 1950-10-10. p. 1.
- ...ALT0b ... that Richardson Island was the involved in an "annexation war" between two cities in the 1950s?
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Bill Godwin
5x expanded by JPxG (talk). Self-nominated at 22:20, 18 September 2021 (UTC).
- Waiting on QPQ. Also, article prose was expanded from 424 B to 1941 B, which isn't *quite* a 5x expansion (4.5)-- could about 200 B of prose be added? Hook seems to be verified, but based on what I'm reading I wonder whether it might be more accurate to say "was involved in an "annexation war"". Article is cited to reliable sources and no evident copyvio. Hook is interesting and cited in article. Also, the article, while it is >1500 B is still classified as a stub, which for DYK purposes it shouldn't be. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)
- Have expanded from the sources a bit (apologies for the error, I was going on word count rather than byte count). I am fine with either hook -- will return with QPQ shortly. jp×g 12:57, 20 September 2021 (UTC)
- @Eddie891: QPQ completed, check it out. jp×g 07:17, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- ALT0b is GTG Eddie891 Talk Work 20:38, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
- Waiting on QPQ. Also, article prose was expanded from 424 B to 1941 B, which isn't *quite* a 5x expansion (4.5)-- could about 200 B of prose be added? Hook seems to be verified, but based on what I'm reading I wonder whether it might be more accurate to say "was involved in an "annexation war"". Article is cited to reliable sources and no evident copyvio. Hook is interesting and cited in article. Also, the article, while it is >1500 B is still classified as a stub, which for DYK purposes it shouldn't be. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:36, 19 September 2021 (UTC)