| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Rick Perlstein be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Sparseness of biographic content makes page read like an advert from his publisher. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 4.30.122.246 (talk) 14:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
This page reads like an advertisement for his books with breathless quotes from various reviews. Needs a complete rewrite to focus on content and less on reviews. Tdietterich (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Rick Perlstein. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151121130957/http://events.latimes.com/bookprizes/previous-winners/year-2001/ to http://events.latimes.com/bookprizes/previous-winners/year-2001/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130405013402/http://events.latimes.com/bookprizes/previous-winners/winners-by-award/ to http://events.latimes.com/bookprizes/previous-winners/winners-by-award/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:15, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Perlstein, Rick; et al. (2005). The Stock Ticker and the Superjumbo: How the Democrats Can Once Again Become America's Dominant Political Party. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm. ISBN 0-9761475-0-5. needs discussion including quotes from reviews. There is a WP:NPOV issue when 3 books discussing Conservatism are discussed, and the one book discussing The Left is not. — Lentower (talk) 19:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Hm.. Perlstein is considered a liberal. That he wrote a massive set of books on the rise of Conservativism in America - basically a social history through that lens, of the two decades 1960-1980. There is nothing biased that requires a banner tag. If you think content is missing please add it. -- GreenC 04:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
- The other thing is that the C books are histories of lasting importance whereas The Stock Ticker had a short life about the political moment ca. 2005. It's not so simple as conservative vs. democrat books, that is a false balance. -- GreenC 04:16, 23 November 2020 (UTC)
Bibliography
editI have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section:
- Cite templates will be used where possible.
- I prefer capitalization and punctuation to follow the standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, rather than "title case".
- Links to potentially unreliable digitised copies may be removed.
This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 06:29, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
- I disagree with commenting out the author. First, arguments in citation templates should either be used or deleted it creates clutter and confusion for other processes. Second, maintaining the author is important for other processes that (may) need that information. A cite book without an author is not good. Third, it should use
|first1=+|last1=not|author=, so other processes can more accurately parse the information. -- GreenC 15:41, 20 October 2022 (UTC)- Thanks for the comments. I often "comment out" the author fields when there are no other authors in the citation, i.e. for the human reader, repeating the author can be redundant. I've always assumed that any robust metadata-harvesting process (such as XSLT) would still be able to extract the relevant metadata, but if you think it's necessary I will leave the author fields in place. Sunwin1960 (talk) 09:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- No one is going to try and extract commented metadata because it's not reliable in weird formats with inline comments etc.. in cases like this where it's a bibliography use
|author-mask=1-- GreenC 15:18, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
- No one is going to try and extract commented metadata because it's not reliable in weird formats with inline comments etc.. in cases like this where it's a bibliography use
- Thanks for the comments. I often "comment out" the author fields when there are no other authors in the citation, i.e. for the human reader, repeating the author can be redundant. I've always assumed that any robust metadata-harvesting process (such as XSLT) would still be able to extract the relevant metadata, but if you think it's necessary I will leave the author fields in place. Sunwin1960 (talk) 09:38, 21 October 2022 (UTC)