Talk:River Tamar

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Geopersona in topic Length of river

Image of source available on Commons, but not added

edit

File:Woolley Moor - geograph.org.uk - 698218.jpg shows the source of the Tamar. It's a view of an unprepossessing patch of brambly thicket and I didn't think worth adding. If anybody's interested, it flows from the bank, centre-left, roughly towards the lower left.

Any info on the origin of the name?

edit

Is it from the Bible? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 188.27.243.153 (talk) 10:29, 16 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

It's very likely not Biblical. The page text says; "prehistoric river word apparently meaning "dark flowing" and which it shares with the River Thames." Which looks pretty likely as the name for the Thames in Celtic Britain was Tamesis. The Dark Sea [similar enough to the Dark Flowing] or Water's Darkness or the Watery Dark seem possible with my limited knowledge of Celtic languages but I'm not about to call that final. However, if it's a pre-PIE word or even a Pre-Celtic one, then there's likely no seriously intelligible translation for it.

I'd recommend just saying that's it's of ambigious origin, though likely Early Celtic and related to the Thames.

--Fauxlosophe (talk) 06:57, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

I just added a bunch of info about the source of the name (see "Legend of Tamara" section under "Folklore"). I am confused, however, by the reference to "dark flowing" as the meaning. I am sitting here with a stack of books about the Tamar, and all of them say the same thing, that it means "Great Water"--and none of them says anything at all about "dark flowing." I don't see any source in the article for this "dark flowing" reference, although I see the "dark flowing" stuff parroted all over the internet with identical wording to what's in this article. Can someone provide a genuine source for that information? Otherwise I think it should come out, because there are at least three sources saying "Great Water". Tamarleigh (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

This is an interesting discussion (to which there may never be a perfect solution). This book of place names (p 454 for Thames) also has "dark flowing" or similar as does this book on the Thames. Eilert Ekwall (my preferred source for English place names) on page 459, traces the name back to Tamdros in c. 150 & various variations over the centuries and links it to TAME -> Thames suggesting melt water but does suggest the Sanskrit word for "darkness".— Rod talk 13:38, 9 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

The West Country Challenge

edit

Would you like to win up to £250 in Amazon vouchers for participating in The West Country Challenge?

The The West Country Challenge will take place from 8 to 28 August 2016. The idea is to create and improve articles about Bristol, Somerset, Devon, Cornwall and the Isles of Scilly, Dorset, Wiltshire and Gloucestershire, like this one.

The format will be based on Wales's successful Awaken the Dragon which saw over 1000 article improvements and creations and 65 GAs/FAs. As with the Dragon contest, the focus is more on improving core articles and breathing new life into those older stale articles and stubs which might otherwise not get edited in years. All contributions, including new articles, are welcome though.

Work on any of the items at:

or other articles relating to the area.

There will be sub contests focusing on particular areas:

To sign up or get more information visit the contest pages at Wikipedia:WikiProject England/The West Country Challenge.— Rod talk 16:07, 18 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

I have corrected the article to show that excursions beyond Calstock have been suspended indefinitely. I was told by the operator that a tree had falled in the river between Calstock and Morwellham Quay and there were difficulties over its removal. I have not been able to find a citation for the "tree" story, but there were many trees blown down during the gales on 9 March 2016.[1] Exbrum (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

References

Article split

edit

I think Tamar Valley should be split out of this article, it is non standard having a landmass discussed inside an article about a river because plainly the valley isn't inside the river. Comments? Szzuk (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Are you referring to the Tamar Valley AONB? In any case, is there enough material for a stand-alone article? If not, just keep it in this article - it's not unrelated, as the valley is there directly because of the river! Sumorsǣte (talk) 19:28, 26 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Bridge? What bridge?

edit

The illustrative photograph that purports to show a bridge doesn't do so, as far as I can tell. The stretch of road shown appears to have brambly thickets all the way on both sides, with no sign of a river or a bridge that I can see. --Haruo (talk) 05:54, 30 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Length of river

edit

It is not immediately clear where the Tamar is considered to end and hence how long it may be considered to be, though there's a length quoted from EB1911. The article suggests it stops as it enters the Hamoaze but that page says that the Hamoaze is a stretch of the tidal R Tamar, so ought it not to be included? My own measurements (derived from online 1:25,000 scale OS mapping using a digital tool - 'wheresthepath') reckon the river to be 105km/65mi from source to the county limit in the vicinity of the road and rail bridges, a figure already somewhat in excess of the EB figure (which experience with other British rivers has shown should be taken with a pinch of salt). I'd be confident of the accuracy of my measurement to better than 1% but it is of course original research on my part so cannot be included in the article but it does at least give an idea of what a true figure should look like if and when an editor finds a suitable reference out there! cheers Geopersona (talk) 14:48, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

I had intended to note also that the map showing its catchment extends to include Hamoaze in the definition. Geopersona (talk) 16:39, 24 December 2021 (UTC)Reply