Talk:Robert K. A. Gardiner/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Guettarda (talk · contribs) 14:50, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

This is really nice work Indy beetle. You handled the conflicting and incomplete sources well. It's an important article in an area where Wikipedia's coverage could stand to be a lot better. My only suggestion would be this sentence: His father died when he was two years old, and one of his siblings also died. It just feels too dry - maybe something like "and one of his siblings died before adulthood". But that's far too minor an issue to stop promotion. Guettarda (talk) 15:40, 23 March 2019 (UTC)

@Guettarda: Thank you for the review. I have implemented the recommended change. -Indy beetle (talk) 19:52, 23 March 2019 (UTC)