Talk:Robertson Field (Connecticut)

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion not met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the airport project.

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Heads up

Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

It seems there's some monkey-business with this article: - there was addition of language to an existing article and references stating that the airport is an international airport - but I'm not finding any supporting evidence. - there was also a second article established named Robertson Field International Airport - with a copy of this article pasted into the article.

I have since redirected the Robertson Field International Airport article to this article - and I've placed citation needed templates for the information that says it's an international airport. It seems strange that it's not listed as one of the state's international airports - and it doesn't even have a control tower.--CaroleHenson (talk) 10:54, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

The closer I look, the funkier things get. It seems as if the article should be reverted to it's state on 17:09, 8 June 2012‎.--CaroleHenson (talk) 11:05, 5 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic