Talk:Rogues' gallery

Crime and Criminal Biography Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Enforcement Mid‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

Untitled

Would it be more correct to use the possessive "Rogues' Gallery"? Does the gallery belong to the rogues, or is rogues simply an adjective for a type of gallery? mumblingmynah

There is also a finnish criminal group called Rogues Gallery. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xaozon (talk • contribs)

Rogue's Gallery

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In AD&D wasn't there a book called Rogue's Gallery? Kingturtle (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

photoset

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Where do 134.xxx's photos come from? Are the first few from Byrnes' book? The last few seem purely editorializing. +sj + 21:25, 29 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Gallery

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I thought the gallery should be included - maybe with not as many images, but certainly some can be relevant here. Kingturtle (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I think the one image that's in the article now is sufficient illustration of the topic. Maybe if the text grew longer it could use more images. But looking at WP:NOTREPOSITORY, wikipedia is not a media repository/gallery site. The same gallery was removed from here and the Mug shot article, and Mug shot links to http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mug_shots which would be a much better place to add all the images that were made into a gallery here. Possibly this article could link there too for easier access for those who are interested in examples. Siawase (talk) 18:23, 27 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rogues gallery. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130320003535/http://image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1952_01_07.pdf to http://image.eastmanhouse.org/files/GEH_1952_01_07.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:21, 14 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic