Talk:Ronnie Screwvala
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
File:Ronnie Screwvala 2007 - still 18374 crop.jpg Nominated for Deletion
editAn image used in this article, File:Ronnie Screwvala 2007 - still 18374 crop.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests April 2012
Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so.
To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Ronnie Screwvala 2007 - still 18374 crop.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 14:30, 28 April 2012 (UTC) |
This article should be deleted/revised.
editHi, this article should be deleted or at least revised to make the style more suitable for an encyclopedia. If you look at the headers for the division and the general way this page (especially the first few sentences) are written, you'll see that this is quite uncyclopedic and reads almost like an advertisement. MarkIrkutsk (talk) 04:15, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Scattered copyright violations
editAdd to the list of blatantly promotional edits by Yogeshdube (talk · contribs) recent additions that include content copied from Business Today [1]. So, I've templated the article to reflect this. 99.136.255.134 (talk) 03:44, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Proposed merge with RSVP Movies
editThe company fails WP:NCORP and should be merged with the article about its founder. Bbarmadillo (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
- Support merger per nominator's rationale. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:35, 25 September 2019 (UTC)
- Support - definitely makes more sense to have it combined. Onel5969 TT me 21:49, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Support - per nom. Interestingly the discussion still existing since August 2019. Abishe (talk) 04:17, 29 January 2020 (UTC)
- Opppose merge; active film production company producing films. I admit that many of the references are about the films rather than the company (mentions in passing), but some (focussing on the role of the company in supporting emerging directors) have enough company content to warrant independent treatment. Klbrain (talk) 09:48, 16 May 2020 (UTC)