Talk:Roopkund

A fact from Roopkund appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 March 2005. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that Skeleton Lake in India is named after the remains of approximately 600 people who died there in a sudden hailstorm?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2005/March.

Wikipedia

Lakes Mid‑importance

	Lakes portal Roopkund is within the scope of WikiProject Lakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of lake-related articles on Wikipedia, using the tools on the project page. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LakesWikipedia:WikiProject LakesTemplate:WikiProject LakesLakes articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

India: Uttarakhand Mid‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Uttarakhand (assessed as Mid-importance).

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

'Skeleton Lake and 'Roopkund' is the same thing .Name 'Roopkund' indicates geographic location and only popular name in India. So,better merge both the articles under single name 'Roopkund'.Tribhuwan

Agreed. Please go ahead and do so if you feel motivated. Wachholder0 00:33, 19 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

WP:INDIA Banner/Uttarakhand workgroup Addition

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Note: {{WP India}} Project Banner with Uttarakhand workgroup parameters was added to this article talk page because the article falls under Category:Uttarakhand or its subcategories. Should you feel this addition is inappropriate , please undo my changes and update/remove the relavent categories to the article -- TinuCherian ^{(Wanna Talk?)} - 13:55, 23 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

Legends - how much weightage to be given?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

It is a proven fact that hundreds of skeletons are found in the lake. But, there is no historical reliable records for the reasons of this find. Legends say that hail stones of size of cricket balls killed a large group pilgrims and some sources are also available for these legends. My question is, how much weightage/importance is to be given for this legend/legends in the body of the article? Some importance is appropriate, as there are no other proven reliable records for the reasons of such a large number of skeletons in the lake. Rayabhari (talk) 04:56, 30 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Ongoing edit conflict regarding altitude of the lake

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

We seem to have an ongoing lack of consensus regarding the lake's altitude and whether or not it should be converted. Can we please discuss this before further changes are made? Thanks.

Cadar (talk) 17:39, 24 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

nature.com article

Latest comment: 5 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Research published @ nature.com suggests that the remains are from ~800CE and ~1800CE, eastern Mediterran and Southeast Asian individuals. Andree.sk (talk) 13:50, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

1800 CE is what it says in the nature article CE Common Era , ie AD. This has been morphed to BC in the article as well as in popular press coverage. (Perhaps using an obscure but politically correct terminology isn't such a great idea after all!)

Gjxj (talk) 20:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)Reply

Add topic