This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is part of WikiProject Cricket which aims to expand and organise information better in articles related to the sport of cricket. Please participate by visiting the project and talk pages for more details.CricketWikipedia:WikiProject CricketTemplate:WikiProject Cricketcricket articles
There is a toolserver based WikiProject Cricket cleanup list that automatically updates weekly to show all articles covered by this project which are marked with cleanup tags. (also available in one big list and in CSV format)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago5 comments3 people in discussion
@Fade258 and Lugnuts: According to Cricinfo (the source that we use), Gaikwad is #88 and Devdutt Padikkal is #89, which makes sense alphabetically by surname. Is there an image of them wearing cap numbers that contradict the source, or can we revert to match the source? Bs1jac (talk) 09:31, 30 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi @Bs1jac: Yes, Exactly source says that. Generally, In Wikipedia we add content or information which is verified by reliable, independent etc sources.Fade258 (talk) 12:28, 31 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
@Fade258: Yes that is why I flagged it, because it was wrong here. To be honest I thought it was you that had swapped to the wrong order, but I now see you had been trying to correct it... and someone else changed it back to the wrong order again... and again today! Bs1jac (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2021 (UTC)Reply
Done- Added template on talk page. --Contributers2020Talk to me here 14:25, 22 December 2021 (UTC)